Law of Hurt in Nepal (2026): Simple, Grievous & Negligent Hurt Guide
A 2026 practitioner's guide to the law of hurt in Nepal under Sections 191-197 of the Muluki Criminal Code 207...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
Nepal's environmental law is built around a single screening question — does this proposed activity need an environmental study before it can begin, and if so, at what tier? The Environment Protection Act 2076 (2019) sets out three tiers of pre-approval study (Brief Environmental Study, Initial Environmental Examination, full Environmental Impact Assessment), graduates the penalty for skipping the required tier, and gives the Department of Environment under the Ministry of Forests and Environment the power to enforce against violators. The framework sits under the Constitution Article 30 fundamental right to a clean and healthy environment and is supplemented by the Penal Code 2074 environmental-offence overlay where pollution amounts to a crime.
This guide covers the operational framework for industries, developers, NGO compliance officers and lawyers advising on environmental matters in Nepal. Which projects need which tier of study, what the penalty for skipping it actually costs, who regulates, what the EIA process looks like, and where the criminal-law overlay kicks in for serious pollution offences.
Environment pollution law in Nepal is governed by the Environment Protection Act 2076 (2019), the Environment Protection Rules 2077, and the Constitution Article 30 right to a clean environment. The Act creates a three-tier project-screening system: Brief Environmental Study (small-scale projects), Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) (medium-scale), and full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) (large-scale projects with significant environmental impact). The screening tier is determined by Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection Rules. Implementation without the required study or contrary to an approved study triggers fines: up to NPR 5 lakh for skipping a Brief Study, up to NPR 10 lakh for skipping an IEE, up to NPR 50 lakh for skipping an EIA. The Department of Environment under the Ministry of Forests and Environment is the central regulator. The Penal Code 2074 adds criminal-side liability for serious pollution offences. The Act expressly prohibits anyone from creating pollution that significantly harms public life, health or the environment.
Alpine Law Associates — trusted by 1,000+ clients across family, corporate, civil, and criminal cases in Nepal.
Speak with our lawyers today →
Our civil and corporate practice handles environmental compliance, EIA / IEE preparation review, defence in EPA 2076 enforcement actions, and public-interest litigation on pollution under the Constitution Article 30. The recurring pattern in defence work is the project that started construction without the required study because the developer assumed a lower-tier screening was sufficient. By the time the Department of Environment issues a notice the project is partially built and the penalty exposure is in the seven-figure range. Getting the screening tier right at the proposal stage is the highest-leverage piece of legal work in any project that affects land, air, water or biodiversity in Nepal.
The Environment Protection Act 2076 (2019) replaced the predecessor Act of 2053 and sits at the centre of Nepal's environmental regulatory framework. Its core mechanisms:
Industries operating without the required environmental study, projects breaching their approved Environmental Management Plan, and dischargers exceeding pollution standards all fall within the Act's enforcement perimeter.
The Environment Protection Act 2076 read with the Environment Protection Rules 2077 classifies every proposal into one of three tiers based on Schedule 1 of the Rules. Schedule 1 lists project types and capacity thresholds that trigger each tier. The general principle:
| Tier | What it is | Typical project type | Penalty for skipping |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Brief Environmental Study | Small-scale projects with limited environmental footprint — small-scale tourism, minor construction, certain agricultural projects | Up to NPR 5 lakh |
| Tier 2 | Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) | Medium-scale projects — medium-capacity hydropower, mid-size hotels, manufacturing units, small mining | Up to NPR 10 lakh |
| Tier 3 | Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) | Large-scale projects with significant environmental impact — large hydropower, large mining, major industrial complexes, large infrastructure | Up to NPR 50 lakh |
The capacity thresholds and project-type lists in Schedule 1 are detailed and technical; the determination of which tier applies to a specific project requires reading the Schedule against the project's exact specifications. Hydropower projects, for instance, fall into different tiers based on capacity in megawatts; manufacturing projects fall into different tiers based on output, raw-material handling and effluent generation. Skipping the determination at the project-design stage is the most expensive procedural mistake in environmental compliance.
For Tier 3 projects requiring a full Environmental Impact Assessment, the EPA 2076 read with the Environment Protection Rules 2077 prescribes a structured multi-stage process:
The IEE process at Tier 2 follows a similar but lighter structure with reduced public-consultation requirements and faster review timelines. The Brief Study at Tier 1 is the lightest track and typically does not require formal public hearings.
Article 30 of the Constitution of Nepal 2072 (2015) guarantees every citizen the right to live in a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right. Crucially, Article 30 also gives the citizen the right to compensation from the polluter for damage caused. The combination is significant — the right is enforceable through writ jurisdiction at the Supreme Court (Article 133) or High Court (Article 144), and writ petitions on public-interest environmental issues have been a meaningful vehicle for environmental enforcement in Nepal.
Recent and well-known examples include writ litigation on Kathmandu Valley air pollution, illegal sand mining in the Terai rivers, and unauthorised construction in environmentally sensitive areas. The constitutional framework operates alongside the EPA 2076 administrative framework — proponents face both regulatory enforcement by the Department of Environment and potential public-interest litigation by affected citizens or NGOs.
The Muluki Penal Code 2074 (2017) supplements the EPA 2076 with criminal-side environmental offences. Conduct that significantly harms public life, health or the environment can attract criminal liability in addition to the EPA 2076 administrative penalty. The Penal Code provisions cover:
The Penal Code overlay is particularly relevant in cases involving wilful pollution (a factory deliberately discharging untreated effluent, an operator dumping hazardous waste in a community area) where the conduct is more than an administrative non-compliance. Where the same conduct triggers both EPA 2076 and Penal Code charges, the prosecutor frames parallel cases and the court determines the applicable sentence on conviction.
The Department of Environment under the Ministry of Forests and Environment is the central regulator for the EPA 2076 framework. Its operational role:
Practical advice for proponents: engage with the Department early in the project-design phase, get the screening tier determined correctly before any commitment to construction, and treat the Environmental Management Plan as a binding operational document not a check-the-box compliance artefact. Most enforcement cases involve gaps between the approved Plan and actual operations.
The combination of Constitution Article 30 with the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Article 133) and the High Court (Article 144) gives Nepali citizens and civil-society organisations an enforcement route independent of the Department of Environment. Affected citizens or NGOs can file a writ petition seeking:
Public-interest writ litigation has been central in several high-profile environmental matters in Nepal. The procedural framework for writs is covered in our writ procedure guide.
The Environment Protection Act 2076 (2019) is the main environment pollution law in Nepal, supplemented by the Environment Protection Rules 2077, the Constitution Article 30 right to a clean environment, and the Penal Code 2074 environmental offences. The EPA 2076 creates the three-tier project-screening system (Brief Study, IEE, EIA), prescribes penalties for non-compliance, and gives the Department of Environment under the Ministry of Forests and Environment the role of central regulator.
EIA stands for Environmental Impact Assessment. Under the Environment Protection Act 2076, an EIA is the most detailed of the three tiers of environmental study and is required for large-scale projects with significant environmental impact — large hydropower, major mining, large industrial complexes, major infrastructure. The EIA report assesses environmental impacts, proposes mitigation measures, and presents an Environmental Management Plan. Approval is given by the Ministry or the Cabinet depending on the scale of the project.
The three tiers are graduated by project scale and environmental impact. Brief Environmental Study (Tier 1) covers small-scale projects with limited environmental footprint. Initial Environmental Examination or IEE (Tier 2) covers medium-scale projects. Environmental Impact Assessment or EIA (Tier 3) covers large-scale projects with significant environmental impact. The classification of a specific project into a tier is governed by Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection Rules 2077, which lists project types and capacity thresholds for each tier.
Under the Environment Protection Act 2076, the penalty for implementing a project without the required environmental study is graduated by tier. A fine up to NPR 5 lakh applies for skipping a Brief Environmental Study. A fine up to NPR 10 lakh applies for skipping an Initial Environmental Examination (IEE). A fine up to NPR 50 lakh applies for skipping a full Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA). The same penalties apply where the project is implemented contrary to an approved study.
The Department of Environment under the Ministry of Forests and Environment is the central regulator for environment pollution in Nepal. The Department reviews EIAs, approves IEEs in many cases, enforces against violations, monitors pollution against government-set standards, and coordinates with provincial environment bodies. The Ministry approves major EIAs; the Cabinet approves the largest projects. At the operational level, the Department is the day-to-day touchpoint for compliance, complaints and enforcement.
Article 30 of the Constitution of Nepal 2072 (2015) guarantees every citizen the right to live in a clean and healthy environment as a fundamental right. Article 30(2) gives the citizen the right to compensation from the polluter for damage caused. The right is enforceable through writ jurisdiction at the Supreme Court under Article 133 and at the High Court under Article 144 — public-interest writ litigation on environmental issues has been a meaningful enforcement vehicle in Nepal.
The EIA process under EPA 2076 has structured stages: screening to confirm EIA tier, preparation and approval of the scoping document, drafting the EIA report with the Environmental Management Plan, public consultation in the affected area, technical review by the Department of Environment, decision by the Ministry or Cabinet (approval / conditions / modification / rejection), and ongoing implementation, monitoring and periodic reporting after approval. Each stage has prescribed timelines and documentation under the Environment Protection Rules 2077.
Yes. Public-interest writ petitions on environmental matters are accepted at the Supreme Court under Article 133 and the High Court under Article 144 of the Constitution. Citizens, affected communities and civil-society organisations can seek mandamus directing the Department of Environment to act, prohibition restraining further work on a non-compliant project, compensation under Article 30(2), or directions to formulate or amend rules. Writ litigation is a meaningful supplement to Department-of-Environment enforcement.
The Muluki Penal Code 2074 supplements the EPA 2076 with criminal-side environmental offences. The Code covers polluting drinking water sources, air-pollution offences that significantly harm public health, noise-pollution nuisance, hazardous-substance handling violations, and damage to public natural resources including illegal extraction and encroachment on rivers, lakes and forests. Where the same conduct triggers both EPA 2076 and Penal Code charges, parallel cases run and the court determines the sentence on conviction.
The approval authority depends on the project. For most EIAs, the Ministry of Forests and Environment is the approving authority after technical review by the Department of Environment. The largest and most strategic projects require Cabinet approval. IEEs (Tier 2) are typically approved by the Department of Environment or the relevant sectoral authority depending on the project. The Brief Environmental Study (Tier 1) is the lightest track with the simplest approval path.
EIA timelines vary widely with project complexity, public-consultation breadth and review-stage exchanges. The Environment Protection Rules 2077 prescribe statutory timelines for each stage but the actual end-to-end process for major EIAs commonly runs 12 to 18 months from scoping to approval. Smaller IEE and Brief Study processes are faster, often 3 to 6 months. Project planning should treat the environmental study as a critical-path item, not a parallel workstream.
Yes. Public consultation in the project-affected area is a mandatory stage of the EIA process under the Environment Protection Rules 2077. Formal hearings give affected communities the opportunity to raise environmental and social concerns, with their input documented in the EIA report. Public consultation is also a feature of IEE processes, although typically lighter in scope. Skipping or inadequately conducting public consultation is a procedural ground for challenging the EIA approval through writ.
Yes. The Environment Protection Act 2076 prohibits anyone from creating pollution that significantly harms public life, health or the environment, or that violates government-set standards. Air-quality and noise-quality standards are notified by the Government and breach triggers Department of Environment enforcement. The Penal Code 2074 also covers noise-pollution nuisance and air-pollution offences that significantly harm public health, providing a criminal-law overlay on the regulatory framework.
Yes. The Department of Environment can halt a project that is being implemented without the required environmental study or contrary to an approved study. The Department issues a notice, levies the prescribed fine (up to NPR 5 / 10 / 50 lakh by tier), and may suspend or revoke any related approval. Construction work is typically directed to stop until compliance is restored. Public-interest writ litigation can also obtain a stay of further work pending environmental compliance.
For project proponents, at the project-design stage — getting the screening tier determined correctly under Schedule 1 of the Environment Protection Rules 2077 saves seven-figure penalty exposure later. For affected citizens or NGOs, when a non-compliant project starts construction in your area or when established pollution is causing damage. The advocate frames the EPA 2076 enforcement complaint, drafts the writ petition under Article 30, and represents the client through Department review and Supreme Court / High Court proceedings. Alpine Law Associates' civil and corporate practice handles both proponent-side compliance and citizen-side enforcement work.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
-medium.webp)