Company Registration in Nepal (2026): CAMIS Process, Fees & Capital
A 2026 practitioner's guide to company registration in Nepal — Companies Act 2063, OCR's CAMIS digital portal,...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
An IPO in Nepal is a public share issue regulated by the Securities Board of Nepal (SEBON) under the Securities Act 2063. A public company appoints an issue manager, obtains prospectus approval, completes allotment, and then seeks listing on the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE). Companies considering the route should first review Nepal’s company types.
SEBON regulates Nepal’s public securities issue, while NEPSE handles listing and trading. The route normally involves a public limited company, a SEBON-licensed issue manager, a prospectus, securities registration, public subscription, allotment and listing. Some eligibility conditions and capital thresholds vary by sector, so the current position must be verified with SEBON.
An IPO in Nepal moves from corporate preparation to SEBON review, public subscription, allotment and NEPSE listing. The company appoints a licensed issue manager, prepares a prospectus, seeks securities registration, opens the issue only after the relevant approval, and then completes allotment before applying for listing and trading.
An initial public offering is the first public sale of a company’s shares. It changes the company’s investor base. Before the issue, ownership is held through the company’s existing structure. After allotment, members of the public hold shares under the terms disclosed in the prospectus.
SEBON is the securities regulator named in the supplied material. NEPSE has a different role: it is the stock exchange where the securities are listed and traded. This distinction matters. SEBON approval is not the same event as NEPSE listing.
The route is sequential. A company should not treat a proposed IPO announcement as proof that an issue has been approved or listed. The prospectus, securities registration, subscription, allotment and listing each have a separate place in the process.
A public limited company registered under the Companies Act 2063 may pursue an IPO if it satisfies SEBON’s applicable eligibility conditions and appoints a SEBON-licensed issue manager. The supplied material identifies profit, audited financial statements, positive net worth and sector-based paid-up capital as key conditions.
A private company cannot directly use the public issue route described here. It must first convert into a public company. That conversion is a corporate step, not SEBON approval. The company should confirm the required corporate actions and records before the issue manager prepares the filing.
The current article identifies a profit record in at least three of the preceding five years and financial statements audited under Nepal Financial Reporting Standards as eligibility points. It also identifies positive net worth. These conditions should be tested against the company’s actual accounts, not merely its projected business plan.
Capital requirements can vary by sector. The existing material commonly cites minimum paid-up capital of around NPR 100 million for manufacturing companies and NPR 50 million for other companies. Those figures must be checked with SEBON for the relevant sector before relying on them. A sector-specific administrative threshold can change.
Book-building can be a separate consideration for an eligible issue. The supplied sources identify a book-building method and eligibility cross-check, but they do not establish a universal rule that every IPO must use it. The company and its issue manager should verify whether that method applies to the proposed issue.
A SEBON-licensed issue manager helps the company prepare and administer the IPO. The manager may review readiness, coordinate the prospectus, communicate with SEBON, manage subscription arrangements, support allotment and refunds, and coordinate NEPSE listing. Underwriting may be arranged separately where the issue manager agrees.
The issue manager is not a substitute for the company’s directors, auditors or legal advisers. The company remains responsible for the accuracy of information it provides. Auditors address the financial record, while legal counsel can review corporate authority, disclosures, contracts and regulatory risk.
At the preparation stage, the issue manager works with the company and auditors on the prospectus. The supplied material describes the prospectus as a central filing document. It should therefore match the company’s approved capital structure, financial record, business description and risk disclosures.
The manager also supports the operational stages after approval. These include public subscription, ASBA collection, allotment, refunds and the NEPSE listing application. The exact division of work should be recorded in the engagement arrangement and verified with the manager.
The IPO process in Nepal begins with corporate readiness and ends with NEPSE listing. A company converts to public status if needed, appoints an issue manager, prepares its prospectus, files with SEBON, receives approval and registration, opens subscription, completes allotment, and then seeks listing.
The current article warns that an IPO can take a year or more when the file is not ready. It also identifies a commonly assumed six-month route and a potential 12–24-month delay where the financial track record or preparation is inadequate. These are not guaranteed timelines. SEBON review, corrections, company readiness and listing arrangements affect the actual duration.
An IPO filing generally centres on the prospectus, corporate authorisation, audited financial information and issue-manager materials. The supplied material does not establish one universal document checklist for every company or sector, so the company should obtain the current list from SEBON and its licensed issue manager.
The company should expect the filing to explain who it is, how its capital is arranged, what securities are offered, how its business operates, and what risks investors face. Its financial record must be consistent with the audited information used for the prospectus.
Corporate records also matter. The preparation sequence in the current article includes a board resolution and, where necessary, private-to-public conversion. The precise resolutions, registers, certificates and supporting papers depend on the company’s structure and the proposed issue.
Do not copy a checklist from another company. A manufacturing company, a financial business and another sector may face different capital or regulatory questions. Verify the current document requirements with the office and issue manager before filing.
An IPO in Nepal has no single guaranteed completion time in the supplied material. A company may assume a six-month route, but an unready financial record or repeated corrections can add 12–24 months. A delayed file may remain unresolved for a year or more, while SEBON review and NEPSE arrangements vary.
The timeline starts before the SEBON filing. Public-company conversion, account preparation, audit work, capital restructuring and prospectus drafting can all affect readiness. The issue manager should identify gaps before submission rather than treating the filing date as the beginning of every task.
The supplied material describes return-for-correction as a possible source of delay. It also states that a correction cycle may cost six to twelve months in time. That is a risk description, not a promised period for every company.
After approval, subscription, allotment, refunds and listing still require coordination. The company should ask the relevant authority for the current position on its file. Alpine Law Associates cannot promise SEBON approval, a processing time or NEPSE listing.
The total financial burden of an IPO depends on the company’s structure, preparation, audit, issue-management arrangement, regulatory charges, listing work and continuing compliance. This article does not quote government fees, professional fees or a total cost. Confirm each current charge with the relevant authority and service provider.
Cost planning should include more than the public issue itself. The current article identifies audit, secretariat, listing and investor-relations work as continuing obligations. A company should also assess the internal time needed for disclosures, board decisions, shareholder communication and regulator correspondence.
Capital is different from cost. A paid-up capital threshold is an eligibility condition, not a professional or government fee. The sector-based figures discussed above must be verified with SEBON before a company restructures its capital.
For a current professional assessment, our team can review the proposed structure and route you through a current consultation request. We will explain what depends on the company and what must be confirmed with SEBON, the issue manager or NEPSE.
The public applies through a demat account and Mero Share using ASBA. The application funds are blocked in the bank account rather than debited until allotment. If the issue is oversubscribed, general-public shares are allotted by lottery, and unsuccessful applicants have the blocked amount released.
This is the practical side of a Mero Share IPO. The investor first needs the account access and banking arrangement required for the application. The application is then made through the available issue details and the applicant’s selected category.
The supplied material describes applications as one entry per applicant. It also states that an applicant may use only one reservation category. You should not apply under multiple categories unless the applicable rules expressly permit it.
Before applying, read the prospectus and check the issue details displayed through the relevant system. Mero Share is an application channel; it does not remove the investment risk disclosed in the prospectus.
Nepal’s IPO structure may reserve portions for Nepali citizens in foreign employment, project-affected local people and employees, with the balance offered to the general public. The supplied material identifies around 10% for foreign employment, around 10% for affected locals and 2–5% for employees, subject to the applicable issue rules.
| Category | Position described in the supplied material | What you should verify |
|---|---|---|
| Nepali citizens in foreign employment | Around 10% reservation | Current eligibility and application evidence |
| Project-affected local people | Around 10% reservation | Whether the project and applicant fall within the category |
| Employees | Around 2–5% reservation | Issue-specific percentage and employee status |
| General public | Balance after applicable reserved portions | Issue size, allotment method and prospectus terms |
These percentages should not be read as a licence to claim a category without proof. The issue prospectus and the current rules control the application. An applicant should use only the category that genuinely applies and verify any evidence requirement before submitting the form.
Promoter shares carry a lock-in after allotment under the position described in the supplied material. The lock-in restricts immediate sale by promoters after listing. The material does not establish one universal period for every issue, so the applicable prospectus and current rules must be checked.
A promoter is not in the same position as an ordinary public applicant. Promoter holdings are connected with the company’s founding or controlling ownership structure. A lock-in protects the stated restriction for the applicable period, but it does not remove the need to check the issue-specific terms.
The depository enforces the lock-in according to the existing article. Promoters should therefore identify the relevant shares and restrictions before attempting a transfer. Investors should also read the prospectus rather than assume that every listed share has identical restrictions.
NEPSE listing begins continuing compliance rather than ending the IPO. The listed company must deal with quarterly and audited annual results, material-event disclosure to SEBON and NEPSE, annual general meetings and insider-trading restrictions, as described in the supplied material.
Listing changes the company’s relationship with investors. Public shareholders need reliable information about performance and material events. The company must therefore maintain systems for board records, financial reporting, shareholder communication and regulatory disclosure.
The continuing burden also affects the business decision to pursue an IPO. The existing material identifies secretariat, audit, listing and investor-relations work as ongoing compliance areas. These obligations should be assessed before the company commits to a public issue.
An IPO is not only a fundraising event. It is a change in governance, disclosure and public accountability. A company that cannot maintain those systems should resolve the weakness before filing.
Common IPO problems arise when a company files before its financial record, capital structure or disclosures are ready. The supplied material identifies premature filing, incomplete NFRS-audited records, weak profit history, unsuitable capital restructuring and underestimating continuing compliance as major risks.
Legal review is most useful before the filing becomes urgent. Our team can help with company authority, corporate documents, contract review, prospectus risk points and coordination with the issue manager. We do not replace SEBON’s decision or guarantee a result.
Consider an illustrative manufacturing company that wants to raise public capital. It is still private, its accounts are not ready for the proposed disclosure, and its directors have assumed that approval and listing are one event. The company must correct those foundations before asking the public to subscribe.
First, it would examine conversion to a public company and the proposed corporate resolution. It would then appoint a SEBON-licensed issue manager and work with its auditors on the financial record. The company would verify whether the sector-based paid-up capital threshold applies to its structure.
Next, the issue manager would help prepare the prospectus. The filing would go to SEBON under the stated provisions of the Securities Act 2063. If SEBON seeks corrections, the company may face delay. It should not open public subscription merely because the prospectus has been submitted.
After approval and securities registration, the company could proceed to subscription, allotment and the NEPSE listing application. This example is illustrative only. It does not establish a deadline, document list, approval outcome or requirement for every company.
A company should compare an IPO with its actual capital needs, readiness and compliance capacity. Private-to-public conversion, sector-specific capital rules, book-building eligibility, reservation categories, promoter lock-in and foreign-investment questions can change the route. The company should verify each issue-specific question with SEBON and qualified advisers.
Book-building is one possible method identified in the supplied material, but it is not presented as mandatory for every IPO. A company should confirm whether it qualifies and whether that method fits the proposed issue.
Foreign investors or companies with foreign ownership may also face additional corporate, investment or regulatory questions. The supplied material does not establish a universal foreign-investment route for every IPO. Do not assume that an ordinary domestic filing answers those questions.
A company that is not ready for public disclosure should not treat a delayed IPO as merely an administrative inconvenience. It may need to improve accounts, governance, capital records and risk disclosures first. For broader company structuring and compliance, see our company compliance service.
Verify the current IPO rules with SEBON and the applicable statutory text before acting. The Securities Board of Nepal is the regulator identified for the issue process. The supplied statutory source for the prospectus provisions is the Securities Act 2063.
The Nepal Law Commission is also identified in the supplied material as a statutory source for the Securities Act 2063 and Companies Act 2063. The current prospectus, sector threshold, reservation terms and filing requirements should be checked against the latest applicable position rather than an old blog post or copied checklist.
Keep records of the advice received from the issue manager, auditors and legal advisers. Where the law gives SEBON a review role or where an operational detail is not settled in the supplied material, the receiving authority’s current direction controls the practical next step.
In short: an IPO in Nepal is a regulated chain, not a single application. A public company must prepare its accounts and structure, appoint a SEBON-licensed issue manager, file a prospectus, obtain SEBON approval and securities registration, complete subscription and allotment, and then pursue NEPSE listing. Eligibility, quota, capital and timing questions should be verified before filing.
People also search for:
Planning an IPO, public-company conversion or corporate compliance review? Contact Alpine Law Associates and ask our team about company compliance support in Nepal. We can help you assess the legal preparation and coordinate questions that must be confirmed with SEBON, the issue manager or NEPSE.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
