Minimum Wages in Nepal 2082/83 (2026)
"The current minimum wage in Nepal — effective 1 Shrawan 2082 (17 July 2025), the statutory monthly minimum wa...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
Social Security Fund Nepal (SSF, or samajik suraksha kosh) operates under the Contribution-Based Social Security Act 2074. For enrolled formal-sector employment, the stated contribution is 31% of basic salary: 11% from the employee and 20% from the employer, supporting four protection schemes.
SSF Nepal combines employment-based contributions with social protection under the Contribution-Based Social Security Act 2074 and Regulations 2075. The framework covers formal-sector enrolment, monthly deposits, four schemes, old-age protection, and transition questions involving provident fund and gratuity. Particular benefits and eligibility conditions should be verified with SSF.
The Social Security Fund is the institution that administers Nepal’s contribution-based social insurance. It operates under the Contribution-Based Social Security Act 2074 and the Contribution-Based Social Security Regulations 2075. The framework connects employer and employee contributions with four protection schemes, while separate routes may apply to self-contributors and transition cases.
The Nepali name is samajik suraksha kosh. In everyday business language, people also use “SSF Nepal”, “SSF contribution”, and “social security registration”. These terms usually point to the same contribution-based system, but the legal question is always more specific: who is enrolled, what salary base is used, what has been deposited, and which benefit condition applies?
The Fund is described in the current material as an autonomous institution under the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security. It launched operations in November 2018. You can review the Fund’s official information through the Social Security Fund website and the parent ministry’s material through the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security.
The Contribution-Based Social Security Act 2074 provides the primary legal framework for SSF Nepal, while the Contribution-Based Social Security Regulations 2075 provide operational rules. The Labour Act 2074 is also identified as making enrolment mandatory for formal-sector employers. The Fund administers the system under the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Security.
The statute matters because SSF is not simply a payroll savings account. It is a contribution-based social insurance structure. Contributions are linked to protection for medical treatment, maternity, accident, disability, dependent family members and old age. The exact payment or claim position can depend on the relevant scheme conditions.
The Nepal Law Commission is an appropriate government source for checking the Act and Regulations. A business should not rely only on a payroll summary or an informal explanation. If the employer has a branch structure, earlier provident-fund arrangements, foreign workers or missing employee records, legal review may be sensible.
SSF Nepal uses a stated 31% contribution on basic salary: 11% is deducted from the employee and 20% is paid by the employer. The employer’s contribution is additional to the employee deduction. The current material states that the monthly deposit is made by the 15th of the following Nepali month.
The distinction between basic salary and gross salary is central. Gross salary may include allowances, but the stated SSF calculation is based on basic salary. A payroll system that does not separate basic salary from allowances can produce a contribution error. The employer should keep the salary basis, employee deduction and employer payment capable of reconciliation.
The 31% figure is often searched as “SSF 31 percent”. That phrase does not mean that an employee personally pays 31%. On the stated structure, the employee share is 11%, while the employer share is 20%. A payslip, payroll register and SSF deposit record should therefore be read together.
The four SSF schemes are Medical Treatment, Health and Maternity; Accident and Disability; Dependent Family Protection; and Old-Age Protection. The current framework treats old-age protection as one scheme, even though its retirement and pension features may be discussed separately. Each benefit remains subject to its own eligibility conditions.
| SSF scheme | What it addresses | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Treatment, Health and Maternity | Treatment, health, sickness and maternity protection. | The applicable claim condition and benefit detail. |
| Accident and Disability | Workplace and general accident protection and disability compensation. | The accident, disability and claim requirements. |
| Dependent Family Protection | Protection for eligible dependants after a member’s death. | The position of a spouse, children and dependent parents. |
| Old-Age Protection | Retirement protection through pension or retirement-fund treatment. | The age and contribution conditions. |
The old-age material states that a member may qualify for a monthly pension at age 60 after a minimum of 180 months, while a lump-sum route may apply in another situation. Because pension treatment depends on the member’s contribution record and the applicable rules, you should verify the current position before making a retirement decision.
Formal-sector employers and their employees fall within the main SSF enrolment framework. The current material describes employer registration, employee registration and monthly contributions as the core process. Self-employed people, informal workers and non-resident Nepalis may have a separate voluntary self-contributor route, subject to the conditions of each scheme.
For an employer, the practical issue is not merely opening an account. The employer must identify the covered workforce, ensure employees are recorded correctly, calculate the stated contribution on basic salary and preserve evidence of payment. A missed employee can create a different problem from a late or incorrectly calculated contribution.
For an employee, check whether your SSF record exists, whether your identity details match the employer’s payroll record and whether the monthly contribution appears correctly. If your employer says that registration is complete but you have no SSF ID or the record is incomplete, ask for clarification and keep your payslips and employment documents.
The employer begins by registering through the SSF employer system, then records employees, obtains their SSF identification and runs the monthly contribution cycle. The current material identifies PAN or VAT details, company registration documents, an employee list, identity documents and an SSF Memorandum of Understanding as part of the registration information.
This is a compliance sequence, not a promise that registration or a benefit claim will be completed within a particular time. Portal requirements, document formats and office instructions can change. Verify the live position with the receiving authority.
The current SSF material identifies business and employee records for employer registration: PAN or VAT details, company registration documents, an employee list, employee identity documents and an SSF Memorandum of Understanding. The exact upload format, certification requirement and additional information are not settled by this article and should be verified with SSF.
Keep one consistent record set. The company’s legal name should match its registration and tax records. Employee names and identity details should match the employment and payroll records. The basic-salary figure used for the 31% calculation should be traceable to the salary record for the relevant month.
Do not assume that one employee’s document problem invalidates the whole employer record, or that a portal submission automatically proves a complete registration. Ask SSF to confirm what remains outstanding.
The current article states that the monthly SSF deposit is due by the 15th of the following Nepali month. This is the key operating deadline in the supplied material. A late deposit may attract a penalty under the Act, but this article does not state a penalty amount; confirm the current consequence with SSF.
The employer should build the date into its payroll calendar. The process should allow time to confirm employee records, basic salary, the 11% deduction, the 20% employer share and the final deposit record. A payment made without checking the employee list can leave a contribution unmatched.
There is no single guaranteed processing timeline for employer registration, correction, transfer or benefit claims in the supplied material. The office, portal, document status and nature of the request can affect what happens next. Treat any unofficial promise of a fixed completion period cautiously.
The SSF monthly cycle runs from employer and employee records to calculation, deposit and reconciliation; the stated deposit date is the 15th of the following Nepali month.
For an SSF-enrolled employer, the supplied framework states that SSF replaces older provident-fund and gratuity arrangements. The older provident-fund description is 10% employee contribution plus 10% employer contribution. However, transition cases and existing EPF or CIT arrangements may require separate analysis rather than an automatic payroll change.
| Issue | SSF position described in the material | Practical question |
|---|---|---|
| Current SSF contribution | 31% of basic salary | Was the correct basic-salary figure used? |
| Employee share | 11% | Was the deduction shown correctly? |
| Employer share | 20% | Was the employer payment added? |
| Older provident fund | 10% plus 10% under the older description | Does a transition arrangement apply? |
| Gratuity | Stated as replaced for enrolled employers | When did enrolment and the relevant employment period begin? |
The current material also states that EPF, or Karmachari Sanchaya Kosh, and CIT, or Citizen Investment Trust, continue for civil servants in pensionable service, voluntary contributors and employers in transition. A business should therefore review its actual enrolment status, workforce and historical records before stopping an older arrangement.
Self-employed people, informal workers and non-resident Nepalis may use a voluntary self-contributor route, according to the supplied material. A self-contributor pays the full stated contribution personally rather than receiving an employer share. Scheme benefits remain subject to the eligibility rules, including the old-age conditions described for pension treatment.
This route is different from formal-sector employer registration. There may be no employer payroll to deduct 11%, so the contributor must understand the payment basis and keep proof of contributions. The fact that a route is voluntary does not remove the need to check identity, contribution history or scheme-specific conditions.
NRNs should also consider whether the contribution record can be maintained from outside Nepal and how any claim or correction would be handled. The supplied material does not settle every remote-service, payment or claim procedure. Confirm those matters directly with SSF before relying on the route.
The most serious SSF mistakes usually involve enrolment, salary classification, employee records and monthly reconciliation. An employer can be registered while one or more employees remain missing. A payroll can also show a deduction while the corresponding SSF deposit is incomplete. Each mismatch should be checked against the official record.
Employees should compare their payslips with the SSF record. Employers should reconcile employee lists, basic salary, deductions and deposits each month. If a dispute concerns a disability, dependent-family or old-age claim, preserve the full employment and contribution history.
A business facing an SSF mismatch should first separate registration, calculation, payment and claim issues. For example, an illustrative Kathmandu employer may have registered its business but find that one employee lacks an SSF ID and another month shows a different basic-salary figure. The records should be checked before assuming the legal result.
The employer can compare its company registration and PAN or VAT information with the SSF record. It can then check the employee list, identity details, payroll register and monthly deposit. If the 11% employee deduction appears but the 20% employer share does not, the employer should identify whether the issue is a calculation, payment or posting problem.
If the employee needs medical, maternity, accident, disability, dependent-family or old-age protection, the relevant scheme condition must be checked separately. The four schemes do not become one general claim simply because they are funded through the same system.
This example is illustrative only. It does not create a deadline, document requirement or guaranteed outcome. The office can require clarification, correction or additional information. Our team can help a business review its records and correspondence through labour law advisory in Nepal.
Legal help is most useful when SSF registration, contribution gaps, employee coverage or PF transition affects rights or compliance. A lawyer can help organise the facts, review the stated legal framework, prepare correspondence and advise on a dispute. Alpine Law Associates advises and represents clients; it is not the Social Security Fund and cannot promise registration, processing time or benefits.
Employers may seek advice before first enrolment, during migration from provident fund or gratuity, or when multiple branches use inconsistent payroll records. Employees may need assistance when deductions do not match deposits, an SSF ID is missing, or a family or disability claim is questioned.
SSF issues can also overlap with wider business law in Nepal and employment compliance. If the dispute concerns a contract, termination, salary record or workplace event, the legal analysis may require more than a portal correction.
Bring the available employment agreement, payslips, payroll records, SSF ID, deposit evidence and office correspondence. Do not send sensitive identity documents through an unverified channel. First confirm where the material should be submitted.
Start with the official SSF record, then compare it with payroll and employment documents. Confirm the employer’s enrolment, each employee’s SSF ID, the basic-salary basis, the 11% and 20% shares, the monthly deposit date and any scheme condition. Where the material is unclear, verify directly with SSF rather than relying on an online claim.
A useful review has four parts:
This article is general information, not legal advice for a particular employer, employee or family. The legal position can depend on enrolment date, employment status, contribution history, transition arrangements and the current instruction of the receiving authority.
In short: SSF Nepal is Nepal’s contribution-based social-security framework for covered employment and eligible voluntary contributors. The stated structure is 31% of basic salary, divided into 11% employee and 20% employer shares, with four protection schemes. Register carefully, deposit by the stated date, reconcile records and verify scheme conditions.
If you need help reviewing employer enrolment, contribution records, PF transition or an SSF-related workplace dispute, contact Alpine Law Associates and ask about our labour law advisory service. Our team can help you assess the documents and identify the next step, subject to the position confirmed by SSF.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
