House Rent Law in Nepal 2026: Tenant & Landlord Rights
Complete house rent guide for Nepal 2026 (2083 BS) — Muluki Civil Code 2074 Chapter 9 (Sections 383 to 405), 5...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
Acid attack law in Nepal is mainly governed by Section 192(ka) of the Muluki Penal Code 2074, inserted by the 2076 amendment, alongside the Acid and Other Hazardous Chemicals (Regulation) Act 2076. The framework covers imprisonment, statutory fines paid as compensation, acid-sale controls and victim protection. Our criminal law team can help you assess the next legal step.
Nepal’s acid-attack framework combines a criminal offence under Section 192(ka), chemical-sale regulation and financial relief for the survivor. The punishment depends on whether the face or another body part is disfigured, or whether the act causes bodily pain without disfigurement. Police, prosecutors and courts each handle different stages.
Nepal’s acid attack offence is set out in Section 192(ka) of the Muluki Penal Code 2074. The provision was inserted through the 2076 amendment and addresses causing harm, disfigurement or pain through acid or a similar harmful substance. The Acid and Other Hazardous Chemicals (Regulation) Act 2076 separately controls the handling and sale of acid.
The legal question is not limited to the name of the chemical. The current framework refers to acid or a similar harmful substance. The evidence may therefore concern the substance used, the injury it caused, the place of the incident, witnesses and the accused person’s conduct.
Section 192(ka) creates two main punishment levels. The first concerns disfigurement of the face. The second concerns disfigurement of another body part or bodily pain without disfigurement. The court considers the evidence before applying the relevant level.
Section 192(ka) sets punishment by the injury’s legal category. Face disfigurement carries 5 to 8 years’ imprisonment and a fine of NPR 100,000 to NPR 500,000. Other body disfigurement or bodily pain carries 3 to 5 years’ imprisonment and a fine of NPR 50,000 to NPR 300,000. The full fine goes to the victim as compensation.
| Injury category | Imprisonment | Statutory fine | Compensation effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| Face disfigurement | 5 to 8 years | NPR 100,000 to NPR 500,000 | Full fine paid to the victim |
| Other body disfigurement | 3 to 5 years | NPR 50,000 to NPR 300,000 | Full fine paid to the victim |
| Bodily pain without disfigurement | 3 to 5 years | NPR 50,000 to NPR 300,000 | Full fine paid to the victim |
These are statutory amounts, not professional fees or government charges. The court determines the applicable outcome within the relevant range. A lawyer should not promise that a particular sentence or fine will result. The final classification depends on the facts, medical material, witness evidence and court assessment.
The Acid and Other Hazardous Chemicals (Regulation) Act 2076 regulates the sale, purchase, transport, storage and use of acid and other hazardous chemicals. The framework identifies licensed sellers, buyer identification, purpose declarations and stock records. The Ministry of Home Affairs is a relevant government body, but current licensing details and office requirements should be verified with the office.
Under the supplied framework, a commercial seller must hold a valid licence. The seller must identify the buyer and record the transaction in a stock register. The buyer must state the intended purpose. The material also identifies additional authorisation for bulk sales above prescribed quantity limits, a prohibition on sale to persons below 18, and stock-register inspection by the District Administration Office.
The Act has a preventive purpose. It makes anonymous or unrecorded access to acid harder. A regulatory breach may be separate from the attack itself. Whether a seller or another person faces liability depends on the evidence and the applicable provision. Do not assume that an attack automatically proves a seller’s offence.
An acid-attack FIR is registered through the District Police Office connected with the place of occurrence. The victim, family member or witness may file. If the victim is hospitalised or unable to attend, the supplied framework states that the police should attend at the hospital to record the statement. Verify the receiving office’s current procedure.
The investigation may examine the source of the chemical. The supplied material identifies licensed-seller records, CCTV, online purchase information, telephone records and courier records as possible investigative lines. These are not guaranteed evidence sources in every file. Their availability depends on the facts and what investigators can obtain.
The current material also identifies police custody of up to 25 days for serious cases including acid attack. Custody and bail are separate questions. It describes bail as difficult to secure and records a strong presumption against granting bail in acid-attack cases. The court still decides the application under the applicable law.
Medical evidence shows the injury and its consequences; it does not replace proof of who caused it. An acid case may involve the victim’s statement, medical examination, photographs, clothing, scene material, witnesses, communications, CCTV and evidence tracing the chemical source. Investigators and the court assess the whole record rather than one item alone.
Early medical records can help show the condition soon after the incident. Later treatment may help explain disfigurement, pain, psychological harm or reconstruction needs. Keep original records where possible and give copies through the proper channel. The hospital, police or court may require particular forms or certified material, so verify this before filing.
A prior threat or relationship may be relevant background, but it is not by itself proof of the attack. The FIR should be accurate and specific. Do not add a fact because it appears legally useful. An inaccurate statement can create problems during investigation and trial.
Section 192(ka) links the court-imposed fine to compensation: the full fine must be paid to the victim. The supplied framework also identifies a possible civil tort claim and additional relief under the Victim Protection Act 2075. These routes have different legal bases, evidence and enforcement issues, so the available remedy must be assessed on the file.
A civil tort claim is a claim for loss caused by wrongful conduct. The current material identifies medical expenses, lost earning capacity, pain and suffering, future reconstructive surgery and psychological treatment as possible subjects of a claim. This does not mean every item is automatically awarded. The claimant must establish the relevant loss under the applicable civil process.
The material also identifies a Victim Compensation Fund under the Victim Protection Act 2075 as a possible source of additional relief where the convicted person is insolvent. Availability, eligibility and procedure should be verified with the relevant authority. A criminal fine, civil damages and state relief should not be treated as identical remedies.
Rehabilitation may include medical reconstruction, psychological counselling, vocational training and legal aid. The supplied article identifies women and children offices as bodies that may coordinate these forms of support. Their current role, referral route and available programme should be confirmed directly. An advocate can help organise the legal record while you seek medical and social support.
The supplied framework identifies the limitation period for hurt offences as six months, described as 183 days, and states that an extension may be available where the victim was incapacitated. This is a deadline, not a suggested waiting period. Because the starting point and exception can affect rights, obtain case-specific advice and verify the current rule.
Hospitalisation, serious burns or psychological incapacity may affect the ability to report promptly. Record the dates of the incident, treatment, incapacity and first report. Those facts may matter when the receiving authority assesses limitation. Do not assume that delay is harmless or that an extension will automatically be granted.
The supplied material also flags Section 93 as part of the wider procedural material associated with the existing article. Its precise application to an acid-attack file should be checked against the current statutory text and the facts. This is one reason a lawyer should review the limitation position before a complaint is prepared.
The supplied framework identifies the District Court as the court exercising original criminal jurisdiction for the case, with the District Government Attorney involved in prosecution. An appeal from a District Court judgment may be filed in the High Court within 35 days, according to the current article’s verified material. Confirm the counting rule and filing requirements with the court.
“Original jurisdiction” means the court hears the case at the first trial stage. The District Court considers the charge and evidence, including medical material and witness testimony. The result may affect imprisonment, fine-as-compensation and other relief. The court’s decision cannot be predicted from the injury alone.
If an appeal is being considered, preserve the judgment, order sheets, evidence record and dates of receipt. A 35-day period can pass quickly. The High Court process may require a careful ground of appeal and a complete lower-court record. Verify any required documents and current filing practice with the relevant registry.
Acid cases require early, accurate action. The most serious errors include delaying the FIR, changing the account, discarding clothing or records, contacting the accused without a safety plan, and assuming that the statutory fine will be received without follow-up. An accused person should also avoid contacting witnesses or discussing evidence outside legal advice.
In an illustrative Kathmandu scenario, a person suffers facial burns after liquid is thrown outside a workplace and is taken to hospital. The person should first obtain urgent treatment, preserve the clothing and medical papers, identify witnesses and ask about recording the statement at the hospital if attendance is not possible.
The family may then approach the District Police Office connected with the occurrence. The FIR should state the known facts, including the accused’s identity if known, time, location, threats, witnesses and any available communication. A lawyer can help organise the account without adding assumptions.
Investigators may consider scene evidence, CCTV, communications and the chemical source. The District Government Attorney may become involved in prosecution. If the case reaches the District Court and results in conviction, the relevant Section 192(ka) tier applies and the statutory fine is paid to the victim as compensation. A civil claim and victim-protection relief may also require separate assessment.
An acid case may involve more than one legal issue. The same facts may raise questions about domestic violence, threats, evidence preservation, a seller’s regulatory conduct, civil damages or support for a child victim. Each issue has its own legal test. Do not assume that one FIR or one remedy resolves every consequence.
If the accused is unknown, the complaint can still describe the incident and available evidence. If the victim is a child, additional child-protection concerns may arise and the receiving authority should be informed. If the chemical was purchased lawfully, that fact does not by itself answer whether the later attack was criminal.
If the victim or family lives outside Nepal, local representation may be possible, but the practical route depends on the authority, evidence and required appearances. Our team can discuss representation and document handling, but we cannot promise registration, bail, compensation or a processing time. For a current assessment, use Alpine Law Associates’ contact page.
| Face disfigurementThe higher punishment tier applies where the face is disfigured. | Other body harmThis route covers other body disfigurement or bodily pain without disfigurement. | |
|---|---|---|
| Imprisonment | 5 to 8 years | 3 to 5 years |
| Statutory fine | NPR 100,000 to NPR 500,000 | NPR 50,000 to NPR 300,000 |
| Fine destination | Full fine to the victim | Full fine to the victim |
| Legal provision | Section 192(ka), Penal Code 2074 | Section 192(ka), Penal Code 2074 |
Source: Muluki Penal Code 2074, Section 192(ka)
Section 192(ka) compares face disfigurement with other body disfigurement or bodily pain, while both routes connect the full statutory fine to victim compensation.
A criminal lawyer can help you organise the FIR, preserve the factual account, communicate with investigators, review medical evidence, monitor prosecution, prepare for court and pursue compensation issues. The work is different for a victim and an accused person. The lawyer must act on the facts and cannot guarantee an outcome.
Victim-side work may include reviewing the limitation date, identifying possible civil tort issues, following the fine-as-compensation process and assessing victim-protection relief. Defence work may include testing identification, chemical evidence, medical causation, witness reliability and the legal classification of the alleged injury. These are case-specific tasks.
Alpine Law Associates advises and represents clients in criminal matters. Our team can help you understand the available route, but it is not a police office, prosecutor or court. Government decisions, investigation steps, bail decisions, compensation collection and appeal outcomes remain with the relevant authorities.
Section 192(ka) of the Muluki Penal Code 2074 is the central acid-attack provision. Face disfigurement carries the higher imprisonment and fine range. Other body disfigurement or bodily pain carries the lower range. The full fine is paid to the victim as compensation. Acid-sale regulation, medical evidence, the 183-day limitation reference, civil tort relief and victim protection may all matter.
If you need advice about an FIR, investigation, bail, compensation or defence in an acid-attack matter, contact Alpine Law Associates to discuss your situation. Our team can also assist through criminal case litigation services in Nepal, subject to the facts and the authority handling the case.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
-medium.webp)