Law of Hurt in Nepal (2026): Simple, Grievous & Negligent Hurt Guide
A 2026 practitioner's guide to the law of hurt in Nepal under Sections 191-197 of the Muluki Criminal Code 207...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
The single most important fact about cryptocurrency in Nepal is also the most ignored one — it is illegal. Buying, selling, trading, mining, holding, transferring, or facilitating any virtual currency transaction is prohibited under Nepal Rastra Bank notices read with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019.
That status has not softened. Between August 2017 and 2024 the central bank issued at least five reinforcing notices, the police Central Investigation Bureau has carried out repeated arrests of Bitcoin operators and Hyper Fund organisers, and there is no licensed crypto exchange operating legally inside Nepal in 2026.
If you are reading this because someone offered you a "Binance training", a "Bitcoin investment opportunity", or a "P2P payment channel" — this guide is the legal reality check before you act. We cover the law, the notice timeline, the penalty exposure, recent prosecutions, and the narrow question of personal-wallet self-custody that clients ask about most.
Cryptocurrency in Nepal is illegal in 2026. Nepal Rastra Bank has issued repeated notices since 2074 BS (2017 AD) prohibiting all activities related to virtual currency — use, trade, mining, investment, and facilitation — under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 (1962) and the Nepal Rastra Bank Act 2058 (2002). Penalties under FERA Section 17 include confiscation of the transaction property, fines up to three times the transaction value, and imprisonment whose term varies by the quantum and circumstance. Enforcement is led by the Central Investigation Bureau of Nepal Police and the Department of Revenue Investigation, with prosecutions in the Special Court and District Courts. Bitcoin, Ethereum, USDT, BNB, and all altcoins fall within the prohibition.
Alpine Law Associates — trusted by 1,000+ clients across family, corporate, civil, and criminal cases in Nepal.
Speak with our lawyers today →
Our team has advised individuals investigated for crypto trading on P2P channels, organisations approached by foreign exchanges seeking a Nepal entry, and families whose members were detained after participating in network-marketing crypto schemes. The pattern we see most often is not large speculative trading — it is well-meaning Nepali professionals using Binance or USDT to receive freelance payments from foreign clients, unaware that the inbound flow itself triggers Foreign Exchange Regulation Act exposure. As a full-service law firm in Nepal, our criminal-defence and corporate-compliance teams handle both ends — defending detained clients and structuring lawful alternatives for foreign-currency receipts.
No. Cryptocurrency is illegal in Nepal across every operational dimension — using, trading, holding, mining, investing, facilitating, and promoting. The illegality flows from a combination of central-bank notices issued by Nepal Rastra Bank since 2017 read together with the substantive law on foreign currency dealings.
The legal foundation rests on three pillars. First, the Nepal Rastra Bank Act 2058 (2002) establishes NRB as the sole authority on currency, monetary policy, and foreign exchange in Nepal. Second, the Foreign Exchange (Regulation) Act 2019 (1962) regulates all foreign currency transactions and authorises NRB to license — or refuse to license — entities that deal in foreign currency. Third, NRB's own notices issued under that statutory authority declare that virtual currencies are not recognised as legal tender or as foreign currency, and that all activities involving them constitute unauthorised foreign-exchange dealing.
The notices are not advisory. NRB's position is that any cryptocurrency transaction is, by definition, an unlicensed foreign-currency transaction — and therefore an offence under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. That construction is what underpins every prosecution to date.
Key takeaway: The question is not whether cryptocurrency activity is legal "in some grey area" or "for personal use only" — NRB's notices and the underlying foreign-exchange law leave no grey area for residents in Nepal. If you are dealing in Bitcoin, USDT, Ethereum, or any altcoin from inside Nepal, the activity is unlawful regardless of scale.
NRB has reinforced the prohibition through a sequence of public notices over nearly a decade. The chronology matters for two reasons — it shows the consistency of the central bank's position, and it shows how the prohibition expanded from Bitcoin specifically to all virtual currencies and adjacent network-marketing schemes.
| Date (BS / AD) | What the Notice Established |
|---|---|
| 2074/04/29 — 13 August 2017 | NRB's Foreign Exchange Management Department declared all Bitcoin transactions illegal in Nepal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 (1962). Public cautioned not to engage in Bitcoin trading. |
| 2078/05/24 — 9 September 2021 | Notice expanded the prohibition to "use, trading and mining of any form of cryptocurrency" — extending coverage from Bitcoin to all virtual currencies. |
| 2078/10/09 — 23 January 2022 | Notice addressed virtual-currency network-marketing schemes promising high returns. NRB reiterated that Nepal does not recognise virtual or cryptocurrency as legal tender or as foreign currency, and warned the public against such schemes. |
| 2079/04/03 — 15 August 2022 | Specific notice on Hyper Fund and similar pyramid-style platforms marketing crypto returns. Activities declared unlawful. |
| Subsequent reinforcement notices | NRB has continued to publish "Important Notices" under the Foreign Exchange Management Department restating that cryptocurrency, Network Marketing, and Hyper Fund-type business is unlawful and any transaction will be acted upon under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019. |
The notices are listed in NRB's "Important Notices" section at nrb.org.np. The Foreign Exchange Management Department holds operational responsibility for the prohibition.
Key takeaway: NRB has not weakened or carved out exceptions to the prohibition since 2017. Anyone telling you that "crypto is now legal in Nepal under a new circular" is misrepresenting the public record — the latest notices reinforce, not relax, the ban.
The scope of the prohibition is broad — far broader than first-time investors typically assume. NRB's notices cover not only the active trading of crypto but also passive engagement and facilitation.
The prohibition extends to all cryptocurrencies — not just Bitcoin. Ethereum, USDT, USDC, BNB, Solana, Dogecoin, and every other token recognised in international markets falls within NRB's coverage. NFTs and DeFi tokens that function as financial instruments are also caught. The fact that the underlying technology is decentralised does not affect the legal analysis — NRB regulates the people in Nepal who interact with these systems, not the systems themselves.
Key takeaway: If the activity moves value across a public blockchain ledger and the participant is resident in Nepal, NRB treats it as an unauthorised foreign-exchange transaction. The currency name, the network, and the platform do not change the analysis.
The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 (1962) is the substantive penal statute. NRB's notices identify it as the legal basis for action, and prosecutions to date have moved under its penalty provisions read with the NRB Act 2058.
| Penalty Element | What It Means |
|---|---|
| Property confiscation | The cryptocurrency, the fiat used to acquire it, and the wallets / mining hardware involved in the transaction can be confiscated by the State. |
| Monetary fine | Fine up to three times the value of the transaction or property involved. The Special Court determines the multiple within the statutory ceiling. |
| Imprisonment | Imprisonment is provided for under FERA Section 17. The exact term scales with the quantum involved and case circumstance — competitor commentaries report ceilings ranging from 3 to 7 years; the precise term is set by the court at sentencing under the statutory scale. |
| Additional imprisonment for unpaid fines | Where the fine is not paid, additional imprisonment can be imposed in lieu of payment, scaled to the quantum. |
| Aggravated quantum | For high-value transactions, additional imprisonment may be added on top of the base term — practitioner commentary references thresholds around NPR 10 million. |
| Cumulative liability | Where the activity also engages money-laundering offences, charges may be combined with the Asset (Money) Laundering Prevention Act 2064 (2008), creating cumulative exposure. |
The exact penalty term depends on the facts — the quantum of the transaction, whether the activity was repeated or organised, whether mining hardware was operated commercially, whether the accused facilitated other people's transactions, and whether laundering offences are joined. We recommend conservative reading: confiscation plus a multi-year imprisonment exposure plus a multiple-of-transaction fine is the realistic upper bound for a meaningful crypto matter.
For the underlying foreign-exchange law as it applies more broadly to currency offences, see our pillar guide on currency law in Nepal.
Key takeaway: The penalty exposure is not an administrative slap. FERA Section 17 provides for imprisonment, fines proportionate to the transaction, and confiscation — and the prosecutions to date have used that scale, not a token enforcement.
Three Nepali authorities run the enforcement chain on cryptocurrency matters. Knowing which body handles what stage helps clients understand who is contacting them and what the trajectory looks like.
The arrests since 2017 have included individuals operating Bitcoin trading networks, organisers of Hyper Fund and similar yield schemes, and Nepalis using P2P exchanges to convert remittances. In 2023, public reporting indicated CIB was investigating multiple Nepali nationals for hundi-style cross-border transfers using cryptocurrency as the settlement leg. Cases continue to be filed in 2024–2026, with bank-account freezes and physical-asset seizures forming part of the enforcement toolkit.
Key takeaway: The enforcement chain runs through real courts with real consequences. Hundi-and-crypto cases in particular are treated as serious foreign-exchange offences with combined laundering charges — the bail position is harder than first-time defendants expect.
Most clients we advise on this issue are not professional traders. They are freelancers, NRN family members, IT workers, and small business owners who picked up cryptocurrency from a friend, a YouTube tutorial, or a foreign client's payment offer. The same misconceptions repeat across consultations.
Key takeaway: Most Nepali users get into trouble not because they were trying to break the law, but because they assumed personal-scale or freelance-receipt use was implicitly permitted. It is not. Reconcile your foreign-currency receipts through licensed banking channels, not through crypto.
Foreign cryptocurrency exchanges occasionally explore Nepal market entry. The legal answer is unequivocal — there is no licensed pathway for an exchange, custodian, broker, or OTC desk to operate inside Nepal in 2026. Marketing to Nepali residents, accepting Nepali rupee on-ramps, or partnering with a Nepali firm to offer trading would each engage the prohibition.
Foreign investors evaluating Nepali fintech opportunities should treat anything described as a "crypto wallet", "Bitcoin app", or "DeFi platform" with extreme caution. The promoter is either operating outside the law or misrepresenting the product. Legitimate Nepali fintech operates under NRB's payment system licence regime — that licence does not extend to virtual-currency activity.
For Non-Resident Nepalis advising relatives in Nepal — do not facilitate crypto remittance corridors, P2P swaps for family back home, or "investment opportunities" introduced abroad. The Nepali resident on the receiving end is the one who carries the criminal exposure. Use the licensed remittance and banking channels documented in our guide on NRN rights and law in Nepal.
Key takeaway: There is no compliant way for a foreign exchange or investor to engage Nepal-resident cryptocurrency users in 2026. Anyone selling you a Nepal "go-to-market" plan for crypto is selling you regulatory risk, not opportunity.
These are the questions our team is asked most often during cryptocurrency consultations — short answers below, with links to deeper guides where relevant.
There is no public legislative draft, parliamentary committee report, or NRB consultation paper indicating legalisation as of April 2026. The most recent NRB notices reinforce, not relax, the prohibition. Any decision to legalise would require a clear policy shift signalled by NRB and the Ministry of Finance, followed by enabling legislation amending or supplementing the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act. None of that is currently in motion.
Yes, in principle — holding alone is within the scope of the prohibition. In practice, prosecutions to date have focused on active trading, mining, and facilitation rather than dormant balances. If you have a historical balance, the conservative legal advice is to seek counsel before any further activity, including any attempt to dispose of the holding through an unlicensed channel which itself would constitute an offence.
Importing mining hardware specifically for cryptocurrency mining engages the prohibition because the intended use itself is unlawful. General-purpose GPUs and computing hardware imported for legitimate purposes — gaming, professional rendering, scientific computing — fall outside the crypto-specific prohibition. Customs and DRI scrutiny of declared end-use is the practical filter.
Cryptocurrency law in Nepal in 2026 is not nuanced — it is restrictive and consistently enforced. Nepal Rastra Bank has issued notices since 2017 declaring all virtual currency activity unlawful under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 and the Nepal Rastra Bank Act 2058, the prohibition has been expanded twice to cover mining and network-marketing schemes, and the enforcement chain through CIB, DRI, and the Special Court has produced repeated arrests, asset freezes, and convictions.
The most expensive misconception we see is the assumption that personal-scale trading, freelance USDT receipts, or "VPN-protected" Binance use sits below the regulatory threshold. It does not. The notices and the underlying foreign-exchange law cover use, holding, mining, trading, investing, facilitating, and promoting — at any scale, on any platform, for any purpose.
If you are already exposed — through past trading, an active mining setup, or a freelance-receipt habit — the right move is early counsel before any further transaction. Disposing of holdings through an unlicensed channel compounds the exposure rather than resolving it. For criminal-defence representation in foreign-exchange and crypto matters, lawful structuring of foreign-currency receipts, and corporate compliance for businesses tempted to accept crypto payments, speak with our lawyers today → — Alpine Law Associates is a full-service law firm in Kathmandu with a dedicated criminal-defence and corporate-compliance team handling individual, corporate, and NRN cases across all seven provinces.
Last reviewed: April 2026
No. Cryptocurrency is illegal in Nepal across all forms of activity — using, trading, holding, mining, investing, facilitating, and promoting. The illegality flows from Nepal Rastra Bank notices issued since 2017 read with the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 (1962) and the Nepal Rastra Bank Act 2058 (2002). The prohibition has not been weakened or carved out at any point through April 2026.
Yes. Bitcoin was the specific subject of NRB's first cryptocurrency notice on 13 August 2017 (2074/04/29 BS), which declared all Bitcoin transactions unlawful in Nepal. Subsequent notices in 2021 and 2022 expanded the prohibition to all cryptocurrencies, but Bitcoin remains expressly within the scope.
No. Binance is not licensed to operate in Nepal, and Nepali residents using Binance to trade crypto fall within the prohibition under NRB notices and the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019. The fact that Binance is regulated in some other jurisdiction is irrelevant — NRB regulates the Nepal-resident user, not the foreign exchange itself.
The penalty under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 includes confiscation of the property used in the transaction, a fine up to three times the transaction value, and imprisonment whose term scales with the quantum involved and the case circumstance. Where laundering charges are joined, exposure compounds under the Asset Laundering Prevention Act 2064. Specific sentencing depends on the facts and is set by the court within the statutory scale.
No, in legal terms. A VPN may mask the IP address used to access an exchange, but it does not change the legal status of the underlying activity. The KYC record at the exchange and any bank channel used to fund or off-ramp the trade trace back to the user, and the activity itself remains within the prohibition. Using a VPN is not a legal defence.
No. NRB's notices cover all virtual currencies, including stablecoins like USDT, USDC, and DAI. The fact that a stablecoin is pegged to the US dollar does not change its legal status — it is still a virtual currency under NRB's framework, and its use, trade, and holding fall within the prohibition.
No. Receiving cryptocurrency for goods, services, or freelance work is treated as an unauthorised foreign-exchange receipt under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019. The lawful alternative is to receive payments in convertible foreign currency through a licensed bank, where the inflow is recorded by NRB and converted at the official rate. Crypto receipts bypass that chain and trigger exposure.
No. NRB's notice of 9 September 2021 (2078/05/24 BS) expanded the prohibition specifically to include mining of any form of cryptocurrency. Operating mining hardware, GPU farms, or ASIC rigs from inside Nepal — at any scale — is prohibited. Joining a foreign mining pool from a Nepal IP address is similarly within the scope.
Yes. The first publicised arrests took place in October 2017 when seven individuals operating Bitcoin trading were detained. Multiple arrests followed in 2022 for cryptocurrency trading and Hyper Fund organising. Public reporting in 2023 indicated CIB was investigating Nepali nationals for hundi-style transfers using cryptocurrency. Enforcement continues through 2024–2026 with bank-account freezes and asset seizures.
Three legal instruments combine. The Nepal Rastra Bank Act 2058 (2002) gives NRB exclusive authority over currency and foreign-exchange matters. The Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 (1962) regulates all foreign-currency transactions and provides the penalty framework. NRB's public notices issued under these statutes declare cryptocurrency activity to be unauthorised foreign-exchange dealing. Each notice cites the FERA and NRB Act as its statutory basis.
NFTs that function as financial instruments — tradeable assets with secondary-market value — fall within NRB's notices on virtual currency. Pure digital art collectibles with no investment-like characteristics may sit closer to the line, but the conservative legal reading treats most NFT activity as caught by the same framework as cryptocurrency. Practitioners should not assume NFTs are exempt.
No. Sending cryptocurrency from a Nepal-resident wallet to a foreign wallet is an unauthorised foreign-exchange transfer under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019 and falls within the NRB prohibition. Use licensed banking and remittance channels for legitimate cross-border transfers — money-transfer operators, SWIFT, or NRB-approved fintech — not crypto rails.
There is no public legislative draft, parliamentary committee report, or NRB consultation paper indicating legalisation as of April 2026. The most recent NRB notices reinforce the prohibition. Any move toward legalisation would require a clear policy signal from NRB and the Ministry of Finance followed by enabling legislation; none is currently in motion. Decisions made on the assumption of imminent legalisation carry the legal exposure of the current prohibition.
Seek confidential legal counsel before any further transaction. Disposing of the holding through an unlicensed P2P or off-ramp channel itself constitutes a fresh offence under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 2019. The conservative path is to take advice on disclosure options and the practical risk profile before acting. Do not bring the holding into Nepali bank accounts through informal channels.
No. NRB issued a specific notice on 15 August 2022 (2079/04/03 BS) declaring Hyper Fund and similar pyramid-style platforms marketing crypto returns to be unlawful. Network-marketing schemes that promise high returns linked to virtual currencies fall within the prohibition under the same framework that catches direct crypto trading. Participation, recruitment, and organisation of such schemes are all caught.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
