Company Registration in Nepal (2026): CAMIS Process, Fees & Capital
A 2026 practitioner's guide to company registration in Nepal — Companies Act 2063, OCR's CAMIS digital portal,...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
FDI in Nepal is governed mainly by the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Act 2075 (FITTA), with approval commonly handled by the Department of Industry and larger projects by the Investment Board of Nepal. The applicable route, timeline and compliance depend on sector, investment size and the current office process. Our FDI registration service in Nepal can help you assess the file.
Foreign investment in Nepal follows FITTA 2075, its Rules and related foreign-exchange controls. The main practical questions are whether the activity is restricted, whether the project belongs with DOI or IBN, what the current threshold means, and how the investor will complete company, tax, banking and repatriation compliance.
Foreign direct investment in Nepal means an overseas person or entity placing capital, technology or know-how into a Nepal-based industry or business. FITTA 2075 governs the legal framework. The investment may involve equity in a Nepal-incorporated company, a technology-transfer arrangement, or reinvestment of profits earned in Nepal, subject to approval and other applicable controls.
This definition matters because foreign investment is not limited to money transferred into a bank account. A project may also involve licensing, technical assistance, management arrangements or other contractual technology transfers. The structure should therefore be reviewed before documents are signed. A foreign investor, Nepali joint-venture partner or existing company may face different issues even where the commercial plan appears similar.
FITTA 2075 replaced the former 1992 framework. The current regime combines the statute, the Foreign Investment and Technology Transfer Rules, the Schedule of restricted sectors and Nepal Rastra Bank's foreign-exchange framework. The FITTA reference text hosted by the Investment Board of Nepal should be checked alongside current Department of Industry guidance.
The stated FDI threshold in Nepal is NPR 20 million for most sectors, while information technology industries may have a zero minimum on the automatic route. The threshold is a legal and policy figure, not a professional fee. Whether the IT exception applies depends on the proposed activity and the route accepted by the relevant authority.
The earlier framework referred to a higher threshold of NPR 50 million. The current article's verified material records that the threshold was later reduced to NPR 20 million. It also records the IT exception. Those amounts should not be confused with the total project cost, the foreign investor's proposed share, or any government charge.
Do not assume that a software label automatically places every business on the IT route. The actual activity, structure and supporting description matter. If the business combines software with trading, finance, retail or another regulated activity, the classification may require closer review. Ask the Department of Industry to confirm the current treatment before relying on the zero-minimum position.
| Question | Position stated in the supplied material | What to verify |
|---|---|---|
| Most permitted sectors | NPR 20 million minimum | Whether the proposed activity is permitted and whether the threshold applies to the planned structure. |
| Information technology | Zero minimum may apply on the automatic route | Whether the business qualifies as an IT industry and whether the automatic route is available. |
| Approval authority | DOI up to NPR 6 billion; IBN above NPR 6 billion | How the authority measures the relevant project size. |
| Restricted activity | Approval is not a substitute for eligibility | The current FITTA Schedule and any sector-specific restriction. |
FITTA's Schedule identifies activities restricted from foreign investment. The listed categories include specified primary agriculture, small and cottage industries, personal services, retail business, certain real-estate activities, some travel and tourism services, remittance services, arms and ammunition, radioactive or atomic activities, gambling and certain regulated entertainment.
The Schedule is more useful than a broad statement that Nepal is “open” to FDI. A permitted industry can still require a sector licence, and a restricted activity cannot be made acceptable merely by changing the wording in an application. The business description should match the real activity, revenue model and intended operations.
The current material identifies the following examples:
The categories and wording must be checked against the current Schedule. If your project combines restricted and permitted activities, separate the activities only where the legal and commercial structure genuinely supports that separation. A paper restructure that leaves the restricted activity in substance may create a serious approval problem.
The Department of Industry handles foreign investment up to NPR 6 billion, while the Investment Board of Nepal handles investment above that level under the framework described in the supplied material. The correct route also depends on the project, sector and current administrative treatment, so the threshold should be verified before filing.
The DOI is the principal approval body for many ordinary FDI files, including projects in manufacturing, information technology, hospitality, education and services where the activity is eligible. The IBN route concerns larger investments and projects requiring higher-level investment facilitation. The available material describes the split by investment size, but an investor should confirm how the relevant project value is calculated.
FITTA Section 17 provides for a one-stop service arrangement. In practical terms, that provision is relevant because an approved investor may still need connected services involving incorporation, tax, banking, foreign-exchange recording and sector permissions. One-stop service does not mean every obligation disappears. It also does not allow a restricted activity to bypass the Schedule.
| Department of IndustryThe stated route for foreign investment up to NPR 6 billion. | Investment Board of NepalThe stated route for foreign investment above NPR 6 billion. | |
|---|---|---|
| Stated investment boundary | Up to NPR 6 billion | Above NPR 6 billion |
| Typical project scale | Ordinary eligible FDI projects | Larger or major investment projects |
| Automatic IT route | May be relevant where the activity qualifies | Verify the applicable treatment with IBN |
| Restricted-sector check | Required before filing | Required before filing |
| Timeline information | Published or practitioner timelines vary; verify with DOI | Published or practitioner timelines vary; verify with IBN |
The DOI and IBN routes differ mainly by the stated investment boundary, but both require a current sector and project review.
The FDI process begins with sector and structure review, moves through the appropriate approval authority, and continues with incorporation, capital injection and compliance. DOI confirms a four-step approval flow, while practitioner material describes longer nine-step working sequences. Treat the official current flow as controlling and verify each filing stage with the receiving office.
Some practitioner guides describe the work as a nine-step process. Others refer to DOI targets of seven days and IBN targets of fifteen days. Those descriptions do not replace the official office process. Use the DOI four-step flow confirmed by the supplied source, and ask the relevant authority for the current filing sequence before relying on any timeline.
There is no single universal document list established by the supplied material for every Nepal FDI file. The required papers depend on the investor, proposed activity, company structure, technology-transfer terms and approving body. You should obtain the current checklist from DOI or IBN, rather than relying on a generic online list.
The confirmed compliance areas indicate the information the file must address. These include the investor and investment structure, the proposed Nepal industry, the capital plan, any technology-transfer arrangement, the intended banking channel, and the post-approval company and tax steps. A project may also need a sectoral licence if its activity is regulated.
Before submission, check these points with the receiving office:
Do not treat an approval letter as permission to skip the remaining steps. Company incorporation, capital reporting, tax compliance, sector permissions and annual reporting may each carry their own requirements.
Published and practitioner timelines for FDI in Nepal are not consistent. The current material records automatic-route estimates of 7–14 days, standard-route estimates of 30–45 days, and IBN estimates of 60–90 days. Other practitioner sources mention seven days, fifteen days or a broader three-to-five-month working period. Verify the current timeline with the office.
These figures should not be presented as guaranteed completion dates. The applicable route, completeness of the file, authority questions, project scale, sector classification and post-approval work can affect the overall period. A DOI approval timeline also does not necessarily cover incorporation, bank processing, tax registration, sector licensing or NRB recording.
For planning, separate three periods:
That separation gives you a more realistic project plan than attaching one number to the entire investment. Before signing a long-term lease, hiring staff or transferring funds, obtain current confirmation of the route and outstanding conditions.
FDI approval does not end the Nepal compliance process. The post-approval stack identified in the current material includes company incorporation through the Office of Company Registrar, capital injection through the banking channel, capital reporting to Nepal Rastra Bank, PAN or VAT registration, sectoral licensing where applicable, and annual reporting to DOI or IBN.
The company stage matters because the investment must operate through a legally recognised Nepal structure where the project requires one. The banking stage matters because the capital must enter through the appropriate channel. The reporting stage matters because an investor may need to show how approved capital was introduced and how the business operates.
Tax should be reviewed separately from approval. The live material refers to tax withholding in connection with repatriation and flags the 183-day issue and Section 93 for tax analysis. The supplied sources do not establish a universal tax result for every investor, payment or transaction. Obtain current advice from the Inland Revenue Department or a tax adviser before declaring dividends, paying royalties or transferring gains.
Existing companies should also review their constitutional documents, ownership records, annual reporting and sector permissions before bringing in foreign capital. A new FDI application is not a substitute for correcting an earlier company or tax compliance problem.
Repatriation of foreign investment in Nepal is controlled through Nepal Rastra Bank's foreign-exchange framework. The current material identifies dividends, capital gains and royalties as potentially repatriable, subject to tax withholding and foreign-exchange compliance. The applicable approval, banking evidence and conditions should be confirmed with NRB before any transfer is planned.
The Nepal Rastra Bank Foreign Exchange Management Department has the mandate relevant to this area, and the supplied material refers to the applicable foreign-exchange bylaw as Bylaw 2078. Repatriation is therefore not simply a private payment instruction between the company and overseas investor.
A repatriation review should connect four records:
Different payments may receive different treatment. A dividend is not the same as a royalty, and a capital gain is not the same as a return of paid-in capital. The commercial agreement should therefore be checked against FITTA, tax rules and current NRB requirements before the payment is authorised.
FDI files commonly become difficult when the proposed activity, investment amount, ownership structure and supporting description do not match. Other risks include relying on an outdated threshold, treating a restricted activity as permitted, assuming an IT label guarantees the automatic route, or planning repatriation without first checking tax and NRB requirements.
Watch for these issues:
Keep a written record of what the authority has confirmed. If an officer asks for clarification, answer the actual question and keep the business description consistent across the approval, company, tax and banking records.
Consider an illustrative foreign software company planning a Nepal subsidiary. It would first need to confirm that the real business qualifies as an information technology industry, rather than assuming that every digital service receives the automatic route. It would then verify the zero-minimum position, the DOI route and the current document checklist.
After approval, the project would still need to address company incorporation, capital injection through the banking channel, NRB capital reporting, tax registration and any sector permission. If the company later pays a dividend or royalty abroad, it would separately review tax withholding and NRB foreign-exchange requirements.
This example does not promise approval, a particular timeline or a particular document outcome. It shows why the commercial plan should be tested against the legal route before money is transferred or contracts are finalised. A different investor, sector or project size may produce a different result.
Investors may use equity, technology transfer or reinvestment structures, but the correct route depends on the legal and commercial substance of the transaction. A project may also involve a Nepali joint-venture partner, a regulated activity, an existing Nepal company or an investor who cannot attend Nepal personally. Each feature can change the review.
A foreign investor should consider these edge cases:
Where the law or office practice is not settled by the supplied material, the safe answer is to verify with DOI, IBN, NRB or the relevant regulator. Do not build a transaction around an unverified online summary.
Start with the real business activity, not the desired approval route. Check FITTA's restricted-sector Schedule, the NPR 20 million threshold or IT exception, the DOI–IBN boundary, and the current filing checklist. Then plan company, banking, tax, NRB and sector compliance as part of the investment, not afterthoughts.
People also search for:
FDI rules, thresholds, office procedures and foreign-exchange requirements can change or depend on the project. Alpine Law Associates can help you review the structure, coordinate the approval work and plan post-approval compliance through our foreign direct investment registration service. Contact our team for a current assessment; this article is general information, not legal advice.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
-medium.webp)