Elements of a Valid Contract in Nepal 2026: Civil Code 2074

A contract in Nepal is governed by the Muluki Civil Code 2074 (2017), Chapter 11, Sections 504 onwards. Section 504(1) defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law concluded between two or more persons to do or abstain from doing any act. The provision sounds simple, but the enforceability question turns on a checklist of seven elements — offer, acceptance, consideration, capacity, free consent, lawful object, and certainty plus possibility of performance. Miss any one of these and the contract is either void from inception or voidable at the option of the aggrieved party.

This guide is the practitioner's view of what makes a contract valid in Nepal in 2026 (2083 BS) — section by section, with the void / voidable consequence spelled out for each failed element, and the cross-reference to the dedicated guides on capacity, performance, breach and remedies.

Alpine Law Associates — trusted by 1,000+ clients across family, corporate, civil, and criminal cases in Nepal.

Speak with our lawyers today →

Our contract law team drafts, reviews and litigates commercial contracts across services, supply, distribution, joint ventures, leases and shareholder arrangements. The most common drafting failure we see is not in the substantive bargain but in the elements check — a contract signed by a representative without authority (capacity failure), a one-sided clause obtained through pressure (consent failure), or an object that brushes against regulatory restrictions (lawful object failure). Each of these surfaces only when enforcement is sought, by which time the cost of fixing the upstream defect is many times the cost of doing the elements check at signing.

Element 1 — Offer and acceptance under Section 504

Section 504(1) of the Muluki Civil Code 2074 defines a contract as an agreement enforceable by law concluded between two or more persons to do or abstain from doing any act. Section 504(2) clarifies that a contract is formed when the person who receives an offer communicates acceptance of it to the offeror. The two together are the formation rule — without an offer, an unconditional acceptance, and the communication of that acceptance, no contract comes into existence.

The offer must be definite — not an invitation to treat, not a price quotation, not advertising puff. The acceptance must mirror the offer; any change in terms is a counter-offer that resets the negotiation. The acceptance must be communicated; silence is not acceptance under Nepali law. Where the parties contract by post, email or messaging, the acceptance takes effect on transmission to the offeror unless the offer specifies a different rule. Contracts can be oral or written, but for sale of immovable property, partnership, agency relationships and certain commercial transactions, the Code or specific statutes require written form.

Element 2 — Lawful consideration

Consideration is the value each party gives to the other under the contract — money, goods, services, the transfer of a right, or the forbearance of a right. Without consideration moving from each side, the agreement is treated as a gift or a bare promise, neither of which is enforceable as a contract. Consideration must be lawful — money paid for an illegal narcotic, a commission to influence a public servant, or a fee for a service that violates regulatory restrictions is not lawful consideration and the contract is void.

Consideration need not be of equal value — Nepali courts do not look behind the bargain to test whether the price is fair, only whether some real consideration moves between the parties. Past consideration (something done before the contract was formed) is generally not good consideration, with limited statutory exceptions. Pre-existing legal duty (paying a debt already owed, performing an obligation already required by law) is also not good consideration in itself.

Element 3 — Capacity of the parties under Section 506

Section 506 of the Muluki Civil Code 2074 sets out who can contract. The default rule is that every natural person can contract — the exceptions are minors (anyone under 18 years), persons of unsound mind, and persons disqualified by law (typically those serving a sentence that includes loss of civil rights, or persons declared insolvent). A contract entered by a person without capacity is void from inception, with a narrow exception for necessaries (food, clothing, education) supplied to a minor or incapacitated person, where the supplier may recover from the incapacitated person's estate.

For corporate parties, capacity is set by the Companies Act 2063 and the company's memorandum and articles of association. A company can only contract within its registered objects; an ultra vires contract is void as to the company. Authority to bind the company sits with directors acting collectively or with persons holding written authority — counterparties take the risk of dealing with someone whose authority is not on the public record. The full minor / unsound mind / disqualification analysis sits in our capacity to contract guide.

Element 4 — Free consent under Section 505

Section 505 of the Muluki Civil Code 2074 makes free consent of both parties an essential of a valid contract. Free consent means consent given without coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake. Each of these vitiating factors has a defined Code meaning. Coercion is consent obtained by force or threat of force. Undue influence is consent obtained from someone in a position of dependence (employee on employer, patient on doctor, family member on dominant relative). Fraud is consent obtained by deliberate misstatement of material fact. Misrepresentation is consent obtained by an innocent but incorrect statement of material fact. Mistake covers shared mistakes about the subject matter or the identity of the other party.

The consequence of consent failure is voidability, not voidness. The contract exists and is enforceable until the aggrieved party elects to rescind it. Election must be exercised within a reasonable time of discovery of the vitiating factor; delay or partial performance after discovery can be treated as affirmation. Rescission restores the parties to their pre-contract position so far as possible — money paid is returned, property transferred is reconveyed.

Element 5 — Lawful object

The object of the contract — what the parties are agreeing to do or to refrain from doing — must be lawful. The Code treats the following as unlawful objects: anything forbidden by law, anything the law treats as defeating the provisions of any law, anything fraudulent, anything that involves or implies injury to a person or property, and anything that the court regards as immoral or contrary to public policy. A contract whose object is unlawful is void from inception, regardless of consent or consideration.

This is the element that catches most regulatory failures. A loan agreement at a rate above the statutory cap, a service contract whose performance requires a licence the contractor does not hold, a commercial agreement that contracts out of consumer protection rules — each is potentially unlawful as to object. The remedy is not to enforce a partial valid portion; the contract falls in full unless the unlawful element is severable on the face of the document.

Element 6 — Certainty of terms

A contract whose terms are too vague for the court to ascertain what was agreed cannot be enforced. The standard is whether a reasonable person reading the contract can identify the parties, the subject matter, the price (or a clear method to determine it), the time for performance, and the obligations of each side. Where one of these essentials is missing or stated only in general terms, the court will look at industry custom, prior dealings between the parties, and any objective method the parties referenced — but where the gap cannot be closed, the contract is void for uncertainty.

The practical takeaway for drafting is to nail down the price formula, the scope of work, the time for performance and the consequences of breach in writing. "Reasonable price", "as soon as possible", "best efforts" and similar open-textured language survives where context allows the court to fill in the meaning, but the safer practice is to specify.

Element 7 — Possibility of performance

What the parties promise must be physically and legally possible at the time of contracting. A contract to deliver goods that do not exist (and cannot be procured), to perform a service that requires a licence the law does not permit anyone to hold, or to do something physically impossible (deliver goods within a timeframe that is mechanically unachievable) is void from inception. The doctrine is narrow — it covers cases of inherent impossibility, not cases of difficulty or expense.

Subsequent impossibility — where performance was possible at contracting but becomes impossible due to a later event (war, regulatory change, destruction of subject matter) — is governed by the doctrine of frustration / supervening impossibility, which is treated separately in the Code. Frustration discharges both parties from further performance from the date of the frustrating event but does not unwind performance already given. The detailed performance and discharge analysis is in our performance of contract guide.

Void vs voidable — knowing the difference

The seven elements split into two consequence categories. Capacity, lawful object, possibility of performance, certainty and consideration go to whether the contract exists at all — failure of any of these renders the contract void from inception. The contract has no legal effect and cannot be enforced by either party; money paid under a void contract can typically be recovered, property transferred can be reclaimed.

Free consent failures (coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation, mistake) make the contract voidable, not void. The contract exists and binds both parties unless and until the aggrieved party elects to rescind. The election must be made within a reasonable time and before any act amounting to affirmation. Knowing whether you are dealing with a void or voidable contract drives the procedural strategy — a void-contract claim seeks restitution and a declaratory decree; a voidable-contract claim seeks rescission within the limitation window.

Written form, stamp duty and registration

Nepali contract law does not require all contracts to be in writing. Oral contracts are valid and enforceable provided the seven elements are present and the existence of the agreement can be proved. However, several categories of contract are required to be in writing — sale of immovable property (and registration at the Malpot office), partnership deeds (under the Partnership Act), agency agreements above a threshold value, and any contract specifically required to be in writing by a sectoral statute (banking, insurance, telecom, real estate brokerage).

Stamp duty under the Stamp Duty Act applies to specified contract documents — sale deeds, lease deeds, agency agreements, indemnity bonds, mortgage deeds, partnership deeds. Failure to pay the correct stamp duty does not automatically void the contract but renders the document inadmissible in evidence until the deficiency is paid with penalty. Registration at the Malpot or relevant registry is required for sale of immovable property, certain leases over a threshold duration, and a few other categories — without registration the deed does not transfer the legal title even though the agreement may bind the parties personally.

How contract disputes reach the District Court

A breach of contract claim is filed at the District Court of the place where the contract was performed, where the defendant resides, or where the cause of action arose — Civil Procedure Code 2074 governs the venue rules. The plaintiff serves a legal notice on the defendant before filing, both as a matter of professional practice and because the courts increasingly require it for cost-shifting purposes. The plaint sets out the seven-element analysis (the contract was valid, it was breached, the breach caused loss), the relief sought (damages, specific performance, rescission), and the supporting evidence.

Mediation is encouraged at the case-management stage and increasingly required for commercial disputes. Where mediation fails, the trial proceeds. Limitation under the Civil Code is generally two years for contract claims from the date of breach; the limitation analysis should be done at the outset because a missed limitation is a complete defence. The full breach and remedy analysis is in our breach of contract and remedies for breach guides.

Why retain counsel for contract drafting and disputes?

Contract work has two distinct discipline tracks — drafting and dispute resolution. Drafting is the cheaper end of the work but the higher-leverage one; a clean elements-check at signing prevents the void / voidable / unenforceable surprises that emerge only when one party tries to enforce. Dispute work is the corrective track — once breach has occurred, the file moves through legal notice, negotiation, mediation and trial, with each stage governed by the procedural and limitation rules of the Civil Code 2074 and Civil Procedure Code 2074.

Alpine Law Associates handles contract files end-to-end. We draft commercial contracts (services, supply, distribution, joint venture, shareholder, lease, employment) with the seven-element check baked into the review. We litigate breach claims at the District Court and on appeal, including specific performance, damages, rescission and ancillary relief. As a full-service law firm in Nepal we coordinate contract work with the related corporate, regulatory and tax workstreams so the client does not have to switch counsel. Speak with our lawyers today →.

Last reviewed: April 2026