Performance of Contract in Nepal (2026): Civil Code 2074 Guide

Performance is how a contract ends in success — the parties do what they promised, in the manner and within the time agreed, and the contract is discharged. In Nepal, the rules sit in the Muluki Civil Code 2074 (2017) Part 5, which since 17 August 2018 has replaced the older Contract Act 2056. The Code requires performance "within the time and manner stipulated" in the agreement; where the contract is silent, it requires performance within a reasonable time at the place where the contract was made. Reciprocal duties — common in commercial contracts — must be performed in the order the contract sets out, or in the natural sequence the obligations imply.

This 2026 (2083 BS) practitioner's guide covers how performance works under the Civil Code 2074: who must perform, when, where and how; what counts as actual vs attempted performance; when a third party can perform on behalf of a party (substituted performance); how reciprocal performance triggers the other side's duty; the doctrine of impossibility under Section 531 that discharges performance where supervening events make it impossible; the frustration of contract doctrine; joint and several performance in multi-party contracts; and the documentary trail that proves performance at the District Court when an enforcement question arises.

Alpine Law Associates — Nepal Bar Council-registered contract-law team handling drafting, performance certification, dispute resolution and litigation across commercial, family and corporate contracts.

Speak with our lawyers today →

What does "performance of contract" mean under Nepali law?

Performance of contract is the doing of what each party promised under the agreement — paying the agreed sum, delivering the goods, providing the service, executing the deed. Under the Muluki Civil Code 2074, performance is the principal mode by which contracts are discharged. When both parties have fully and properly performed their obligations, the contract terminates by performance — no further duties remain, and neither side has any further claim against the other arising out of the original agreement.

The Civil Code 2074 treats performance as a structured obligation, not a vague concept. It must be by the right person, to the right person, at the right time, at the right place, in the right manner. Where any of these dimensions is imperfectly met, the question becomes whether the deficiency amounts to a breach (giving the other side remedies under Sections 535-544) or whether it is excused under the impossibility doctrine in Section 531. The distinction drives litigation outcomes.

Time of performance — when does performance fall due?

Time of performance is the first of the four core dimensions. The Civil Code 2074 requires performance "within the time stipulated in the contract". Where the contract specifies a precise date or window, performance is due then; where the contract specifies a payment-by-milestone or delivery-in-stages structure, each milestone or stage is due at its specified moment. Where the contract is silent on time, performance is due within a reasonable time — what is reasonable depends on the subject matter, trade usage, the size of the obligation and the conduct of the parties.

"Time of the essence" is a recognised concept in Nepali commercial contracts. Where the contract expressly states that time is of the essence — common in supply contracts with operational dependencies, construction contracts with critical path scheduling, and seasonal goods — failure to perform on time amounts to a material breach giving the other party the right to terminate and claim damages. Where time is not of the essence, late performance is still a breach but typically gives the other party only a damages remedy, not termination, unless the delay itself becomes material.

Manner of performance — how performance must be done

Manner of performance covers the form, the standard and the method. A construction contract specifying "as per IS 456 design code" requires the contractor to comply with that code; departure is a breach even if the structure otherwise stands. A consultancy contract requiring written reports cannot be discharged by oral briefings. A supply contract specifying "first-grade quality, with mill-test certificate" requires the supplier to deliver first-grade goods with the certificate; lower-grade goods or missing certificates are non-compliant performance.

Where the contract is silent on manner, the parties' conduct, course of dealing, and trade usage fill the gap. Courts read in industry-standard practice as the default manner. Where the contract specifies a manner that becomes impossible (e.g. a discontinued material or repealed standard), the parties either renegotiate or the impossibility doctrine under Section 531 engages.

Place of performance — where performance must occur

Place of performance is the third dimension. Where the contract designates a place — "delivery at the buyer's warehouse in Birgunj", "services at the client's Kathmandu office" — performance at any other place is non-compliant. Where the contract is silent on place, Civil Code 2074 default rules apply: goods are delivered at the seller's place of business unless the contract implies otherwise; services are performed where the service is to be used; money is paid at the creditor's place of business; immovable property is transferred at the registration office of jurisdiction.

Cross-border contracts add complexity. A sale-and-purchase contract with delivery "FOB Kolkata" places the delivery point at the port, with risk and title transferring there; a contract with delivery "DDP Kathmandu" places the delivery point at the buyer's premises in Nepal, with the seller responsible for clearance, duty and inland transport. The Incoterms convention is widely used in Nepal commercial practice and is treated by courts as evidence of the parties' intended place of performance.

Who must perform — personal vs substituted performance

Where the contract is for "personal performance" — a contract for the services of a specific professional (lawyer, doctor, architect, artist) — only that person can discharge the contract. Substituted performance by another professional, even of equal standing, is not equivalent unless the original party consents. Where the contract is for a result rather than personal service — supply of goods, construction of a building, performance of a generic task — substituted performance by a third party is permitted, provided the result meets the contract specification and the other party either consents to or accepts the third-party performance.

Assignment and novation operate inside this framework. Under Civil Code 2074, contractual rights can be assigned subject to the contract's terms and the nature of the right; obligations cannot be assigned without the other party's consent (novation). Where a contract is novated, the new party steps into the original party's shoes and the original party is released; where a contract is merely assigned, the assignee receives the benefit but the original party remains liable on the obligation.

Reciprocal performance — mutual triggering of duties

Most commercial contracts are reciprocal — A pays, B delivers; A provides materials, B performs work; A grants licence, B pays royalty. Civil Code 2074 establishes that reciprocal duties trigger each other. Where party A's duty is conditional on party B's prior performance, party B must perform first; only then is party A's duty engaged. Where the duties are concurrent — payment on delivery, registration on title clearance — they are performed simultaneously and neither side can demand the other's performance without tendering its own.

Refusal of reciprocal performance has consequences. Where party B refuses or fails to perform its part, party A is relieved of its duty to perform and may sue for breach. Where party B's failure is partial, party A may suspend its own performance to the extent of the deficiency and continue with the rest, claiming damages for the partial breach. The remedy maps to the materiality of the breach — total failure relieves the other side entirely; partial failure gives proportional relief.

Impossibility and frustration — Section 531 discharge

Section 531 of the Civil Code 2074 is the impossibility provision. Two categories operate:

• Pre-existing impossibility. Where performance was impossible at the time the contract was made — for example, a contract to sell goods that had already been destroyed at the moment of signing, or to transfer land that the seller never owned — the contract is void ab initio under Section 517's void-contract rules.
• Supervening impossibility. Where performance was possible at the time of contract but becomes impossible afterwards through events not attributable to the parties — destruction of the subject matter, statutory prohibition, death or incapacitation of a personal-service provider, war, natural disaster — Section 531 discharges the contract. Both parties are released from further performance.

The doctrine of frustration in Nepali law tracks the supervening-impossibility category and extends it to cases where performance becomes radically different from what was contracted (not strictly impossible, but commercially or legally pointless). Frustration is narrowly construed by courts; commercial hardship, increased cost, or changed market conditions do not amount to frustration. The bar is "no longer possible to perform what the parties bargained for" — not "performance has become unprofitable".

Attempted performance and tender

Attempted performance — sometimes called "tender of performance" — occurs where a party is ready, willing and able to perform but is prevented by the other party. Common examples are a supplier turning up with goods at the agreed delivery point and the buyer refusing to take delivery, or a tenant offering rent and the landlord refusing to receive it. Civil Code 2074 treats valid attempted performance as the equivalent of actual performance for the purpose of discharging the tendering party's obligation — the tendering party has done what was required, and the other party cannot complain of non-performance after refusing the tender.

To be valid, the tender must be unconditional, at the right time, place and manner, and made to the right person. Conditional tender ("here's payment if you sign this release") or tender of part performance ("here's 80% of what we owe") is generally insufficient unless the contract permits part performance.

Joint and several performance in multi-party contracts

Where the contract is between more than two parties, the Civil Code 2074 distinguishes joint performance (all parties together must perform together) from joint and several (each party is liable for the whole and creditors can demand performance from any one). Default rules apply where the contract is silent — typically commercial contracts with multiple obligors are joint and several, meaning any obligor can be sued for the entire amount; joint-only obligation requires explicit drafting. The distinction matters in default situations: where one of several obligors becomes insolvent, the remaining solvent obligors bear the whole obligation under a joint-and-several structure, but only their proportionate share under a joint-only structure.

Proving performance — the documentary trail

Practical litigation hinges on the documentary trail proving performance. The party claiming performance produces: invoices and receipts evidencing payment, delivery challans signed by the recipient evidencing goods delivery, completion certificates from independent inspectors evidencing service completion, photographs and videos evidencing physical delivery, bank statements evidencing fund transfer, and correspondence (letters and emails) evidencing the request and acceptance of performance. Where the contract specifies a particular form of proof (e.g. "completion certificate from approved engineer"), that form is the gateway — informal proof may not be accepted.

The non-performing party's tactical response is typically to challenge the quality of the performance documents, dispute the authenticity of signatures, allege partial delivery, or assert that what was performed did not match what was contracted. Counsel running an enforcement file pre-empts these challenges by structuring documentation at the time of performance with notarial attestation, third-party witnesses, and contemporaneous correspondence.

How can Alpine Law Associates help with performance issues?

Alpine Law Associates handles performance issues across the contract lifecycle. We draft contracts with clear time, manner, place and reciprocal-performance provisions to minimise downstream ambiguity. We advise clients facing performance friction — partial performance, late performance, impossibility claims, frustration claims — on the right remedial path, whether negotiation, mediation or litigation. We litigate performance disputes at the District Court covering specific performance under Section 540, damages under Section 535, rescission, restitution and injunction under Section 541.

For clients on the suing side, we structure the file to maximise enforcement: securing performance documentation, locking in dates of breach for the two-year limitation clock under Section 544, securing assets through interim relief where applicable. For clients on the defending side, we run the impossibility / frustration / part-performance defences with the supporting evidence. As a full-service law firm in Nepal, we coordinate contract work with related contract formation, breach and remedies engagements in a single counsel relationship.

Speak with our lawyers today →

Last reviewed: April 2026