Company Registration in Nepal (2026): CAMIS Process, Fees & Capital
A 2026 practitioner's guide to company registration in Nepal — Companies Act 2063, OCR's CAMIS digital portal,...
Read more →Alpine Law Associates is the leading full-service law firm encompassing a wide range of legal practices located in Kathmandu, Nepal. It consists of a team of the country's best lawyers, each with expertise in their respective fields, tailored to meet clients' specific needs.
Anamnagar-29, Kathmandu
A profit-not-distributing company in Nepal is registered with the Office of Company Registrar under Chapter 19 of the Companies Act 2063, especially Sections 166–170. It is different from an NGO registered under the Association Registration Act 2034 and an INGO authorised through the Social Welfare Council. Our company compliance team can help you assess the structure.
A PND company gives a Nepal-based not-for-profit body a corporate structure, but it cannot distribute surplus to members or employees. The Office of Company Registrar handles incorporation, while tax treatment, foreign funding and operational permissions may involve other authorities. The correct structure depends on your objectives, promoters, governance and funding.
A profit-not-distributing company is a company incorporated under Chapter 19 of the Companies Act 2063 for an approved social, scientific, academic, professional, charitable or benevolent purpose. Section 166 supplies the entry point. The company has a separate corporate identity, but its surplus cannot be distributed to members or employees.
People also search for “PND company Nepal”, “non-profit company registration Nepal” and “tax exempt entity Nepal”. These phrases describe related questions, but they do not create a separate legal form. The relevant legal form is the company registered under the Companies Act 2063.
The word “profit” can cause confusion. A PND company may receive donations, grants and gifts for its objectives. It may also receive income connected with its work, subject to the law and its approved objectives. The important restriction is the use of surplus. It cannot be paid out as a dividend, bonus or other distributable benefit to members or employees.
This is not the same as saying that every activity is automatically tax-free. Incorporation and tax exemption are separate issues. A company should consider PAN registration and any application for a tax-exempt certificate with the Inland Revenue Department. The supplied material identifies Section 2 of the Income Tax Act 2058 in this context. You should verify the current tax position with the Inland Revenue Department.
Section 166 matters because it limits the type of company that may use the PND route in Nepal. Sections 166–170 form the relevant Chapter 19 framework, covering objectives, non-distribution, member liability, donations and gifts, and restrictions involving merger with a profit-distributing company.
A founder cannot safely use a PND company merely because the founder intends to donate its earnings. The company’s constitutional purpose must fit the statutory framework. The memorandum of association should therefore describe the purpose carefully and avoid language that suggests ordinary commercial trading or private benefit.
The current material identifies three broad objective groups under the Companies Directives:
These categories can cover professional associations, learned societies, research bodies, academic organisations, rights-protection groups and charitable or benevolent bodies. The exact wording still matters. A broad purpose may be questioned if it does not clearly connect with the permitted categories.
Commercial activity is the main boundary to examine. A PND company is not a normal trading company that simply promises to give profits away. If your plan centres on ordinary commercial trade, private returns or dividend-based investment, a different company structure may be more suitable.
The PND route applies to founders who want a Nepal-registered corporate body for an approved collective purpose and accept the prohibition on private distribution. The supplied material identifies five promoters as the minimum, with membership treated as non-transferable and capable of lapsing on death or resignation.
This route may suit a professional body, academic society, research institute, charitable organisation, benevolent fund or rights-focused association. It can also suit founders who want a company-based governance model rather than an association registered at a District Administration Office.
The structure does not give members an ownership interest equivalent to shares in an ordinary profit-distributing company. The current article describes no share capital as required for a PND company. That does not remove the need to explain how the entity will be funded, governed and controlled.
Promoters should also consider the future membership rules before filing. Since membership is described as non-transferable, the organisation should not be planned like a private company whose ownership is freely sold. The company’s constitutional documents should deal with membership, governance and the use of funds consistently with its not-for-profit purpose.
A PND company is registered through the Office of Company Registrar under the Companies Act 2063. An NGO is registered through the District Administration Office under the Association Registration Act 2034. An INGO is a foreign-incorporated organisation using a Social Welfare Council authorisation route in Nepal.
| Question | PND company | NGO | INGO branch |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary route | Office of Company Registrar | District Administration Office | Social Welfare Council route |
| Legal framework | Companies Act 2063, Chapter 19 | Association Registration Act 2034 | Social Welfare Council framework |
| Founding threshold stated in the supplied material | Five promoters | Seven founding members | Foreign-incorporated parent |
| Profit or surplus | No distribution to members or employees | Association-based non-profit model | Programme funding under the authorised route |
| Foreign funding issue | Check SWC enlistment requirements | SWC affiliation is identified for foreign funds | SWC authorisation is central to the route |
The choice is not simply “company versus NGO”. It is a question of governance, promoters, activities, funding and the organisation’s legal identity. The current material identifies a minimum of seven founding members and a 33% female composition for the NGO route. It also describes annual DAO renewal for NGOs.
A domestic professional association may find the PND route more natural. A community-development or humanitarian body may consider an NGO. A foreign organisation seeking to operate in Nepal should examine the INGO route. These are practical comparisons, not permission to begin work without checking the relevant authority.
OCR non-profit registration begins with choosing an eligible purpose, preparing the constitutional documents and submitting the company application to the Office of Company Registrar. The supplied material confirms an online name-reservation and document-submission flow, but it does not establish one fixed completion time for every filing.
This sequence is a planning framework, not a guarantee that every application follows identical steps. OCR can determine whether a proposed name, objective clause or document is acceptable. A clean submission can still require clarification. The receiving office controls the final administrative outcome.
Founders should prepare documents that explain the proposed identity, purpose, promoters, governance and non-distribution model. The supplied material confirms the importance of the memorandum and articles, but it does not provide a complete official document checklist here. Verify the current list and format with OCR before submission.
The constitutional documents should deal clearly with:
Do not copy a private-company memorandum and change only the name. A private company’s ownership and return structure may conflict with the PND model. The objective clause also should not promise activities that belong to an ordinary trading business.
Where the organisation expects foreign funding, the documents should be reviewed alongside the proposed SWC route. A company may be properly registered at OCR and still need additional approval, enlistment or affiliation before receiving or using certain funds.
PND registration has no fixed completion time established by the supplied official material. The result depends on name acceptance, document completeness, OCR questions, corrections and the receiving office’s current handling. Treat any general estimate as non-binding and verify the current position with OCR before committing to a launch date.
The existing article referred to a 10–15 working-day estimate for a clean filing. That estimate should not be treated as a statutory deadline or promise. The safer position is to plan for review time and possible correction, rather than announcing a fixed registration date.
This matters for leases, donor commitments, hiring and public announcements. A founder may prepare those matters conditionally, but should not represent that incorporation is complete until OCR issues the relevant confirmation.
Alpine Law Associates can help prepare and review the filing, but our team cannot promise OCR approval or a particular processing time. For a current assessment, send the proposed objectives and promoter structure through our contact page.
Registration cost can include government charges and professional fees, while tax compliance can create separate work after incorporation. The supplied material identifies an OCR registration charge in the existing article, but this guide does not quote a figure. Verify the current government charge with OCR and obtain a current professional estimate.
The total professional cost may depend on the complexity of the memorandum and articles, the number of promoters, revisions requested by OCR, post-registration work and any foreign-funding or tax analysis. A simple filing and a body with several programmes do not create the same workload.
PAN registration should be considered after incorporation. A PND company should not assume that its non-distribution purpose automatically makes all income exempt. The current material identifies an application under Section 2 of the Income Tax Act 2058 for tax-exempt treatment through the Inland Revenue Department.
Tax exemption is therefore a status to assess and apply for, not a label created merely by using “non-profit” in the company name. Keep the company’s records, objectives and actual activities aligned. Ask the Inland Revenue Department to confirm the current requirements before relying on an exemption.
Social Welfare Council involvement becomes relevant when a PND company or NGO receives foreign funds, including support connected with donor agencies, INGOs or foreign governments. The supplied material identifies SWC enlistment or affiliation as the relevant issue; domestic-funded operations should still verify their position before accepting overseas money.
This is one reason funding should be considered before registration. The founders should identify the likely source of grants, gifts and programme support. A domestic-only plan can change later. If foreign funding becomes possible, the organisation should check the current SWC process before signing a funding agreement or receiving funds.
The Social Welfare Council is not the same as OCR. OCR handles company incorporation. SWC issues arise from the social-welfare and foreign-funding framework. An NGO may have its own affiliation requirements, while an INGO follows a different authorisation route.
Do not describe SWC enlistment as an automatic substitute for company registration. Nor should an SWC step be assumed to cure an unsuitable objective clause or an incomplete OCR filing. Each authority addresses a different part of the organisation’s legal position.
Founders most often create risk by treating a PND company like an ordinary private company, treating tax exemption as automatic, or treating OCR registration as permission for every proposed activity. A careful review should keep the objectives, governance, funding and post-registration duties consistent from the first draft.
Another mistake is choosing a PND company because “company” sounds more credible, without checking whether the organisation needs an association model. The right structure is the one that matches the work, funding and governance—not the one with the most familiar name.
Imagine five Nepal-based professionals planning a research and professional-development body. They want a corporate identity, do not intend to distribute surplus, and expect activities to remain within academic and professional objectives. A PND company may fit, subject to OCR accepting the documents and purpose.
Now change the facts. Suppose the founders plan to trade goods as their main activity and distribute returns to the founders. The PND route becomes unsuitable on the stated principles. They should examine an ordinary profit-distributing company or another lawful structure instead.
In a third illustrative situation, the organisation begins with domestic support but later receives a grant from an overseas donor. The founders should not assume that the original OCR certificate answers the foreign-funding question. They should check the SWC position and any tax or reporting consequences before accepting the grant.
These examples are illustrative only. They do not guarantee registration, tax exemption, SWC enlistment or approval. Your actual objectives, promoters, funding documents and proposed activities should be reviewed together.
Choose a PND company when a Nepal-based group needs a company structure for an approved collective purpose and accepts strict non-distribution. Consider an NGO when the association model and DAO route fit better. An INGO route applies where a foreign-incorporated organisation plans Nepal operations.
Ask these questions before filing:
If the answers are unclear, pause before reserving a name. Changing the vehicle later may require a new registration strategy rather than a simple amendment. A consultation can identify whether the proposed structure is coherent before time is spent on drafting and filing.
Before filing, write the proposed purpose in plain language, test it against Section 166, confirm the five-promoter structure, and decide whether the organisation will seek domestic or foreign funding. Then prepare the memorandum and articles, check the OCR process and obtain current advice on tax and SWC issues.
Keep a written record of the decisions. It should show why the entity is a PND company, how it will avoid private distribution and how its activities will be funded. This record helps keep the application, internal governance and later compliance aligned.
Use the company formation documents guide for broader document planning, but do not assume a general company checklist answers every PND question. The PND provisions and the receiving authority’s current instructions remain central.
Because this is a legal and regulatory decision, this article is general information, not legal advice for a particular organisation. Verify current requirements with OCR, IRD and SWC before filing, funding or commencing operations.
In short: A profit-not-distributing company in Nepal is an OCR-registered company under Companies Act 2063 Chapter 19. It can support an approved collective purpose, but it cannot distribute surplus to members or employees. Compare it carefully with an NGO or INGO, and treat tax and foreign-funding compliance as separate questions.
Alpine Law Associates can help you review the proposed PND structure, objectives, constitutional documents and compliance questions. Contact our legal team or review our company compliance service in Nepal for the next step.
Disclaimer:
This article is intended solely for informational purposes and should not be interpreted as legal advice, advertisement, solicitation, or personal communication from the firm or its members. Neither the firm nor its members assume any responsibility for actions taken based on the information contained herein.
-medium.webp)